Loading web-font TeX/Caligraphic/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 13.34.5. Let \mathcal{A} be an abelian category with countable products and enough injectives. Let K^\bullet be a complex. Let I_ n^\bullet be the inverse system of bounded below complexes of injectives produced by Lemma 13.29.3. Then I^\bullet = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits I_ n^\bullet exists, is K-injective, represents R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \tau _{\geq -n}K^\bullet in D(\mathcal{A}), and the following are equivalent

  1. the map K^\bullet \to I^\bullet (see proof) is a quasi-isomorphism,

  2. the map K^\bullet \to R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \tau _{\geq -n}K^\bullet of Remark 13.34.4 is an isomorphism in D(\mathcal{A}).

Proof. The statement of the lemma makes sense as R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \tau _{\geq -n}K^\bullet exists by Lemma 13.34.3. Each complex I_ n^\bullet is K-injective by Lemma 13.31.4. Choose direct sum decompositions I_{n + 1}^ p = C_{n + 1}^ p \oplus I_ n^ p for all n \geq 1. Set C_1^ p = I_1^ p. The complex I^\bullet = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits I_ n^\bullet exists because we can take I^ p = \prod _{n \geq 1} C_ n^ p. Fix p \in \mathbf{Z}. We claim there is a split short exact sequence

0 \to I^ p \to \prod I_ n^ p \to \prod I_ n^ p \to 0

of objects of \mathcal{A}. Here the first map is given by the projection maps I^ p \to I_ n^ p and the second map by (x_ n) \mapsto (x_ n - f^ p_{n + 1}(x_{n + 1})) where f^ p_ n : I_ n^ p \to I_{n - 1}^ p are the transition maps. The splitting comes from the map \prod I_ n^ p \to \prod C_ n^ p = I^ p. We obtain a termwise split short exact sequence of complexes

0 \to I^\bullet \to \prod I_ n^\bullet \to \prod I_ n^\bullet \to 0

Hence a corresponding distinguished triangle in K(\mathcal{A}) and D(\mathcal{A}). By Lemma 13.31.5 the products are K-injective and represent the corresponding products in D(\mathcal{A}). It follows that I^\bullet represents R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits I_ n^\bullet (Definition 13.34.1). Since R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits I_ n^\bullet \cong R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \tau _{\geq -n}K^\bullet as derived limits are defined on the level of the derived category, we see that I^\bullet represents R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \tau _{\geq -n}K^\bullet . Moreover, the complex I^\bullet is K-injective by Lemma 13.31.3. By the commutative diagram of Lemma 13.29.3 and since K^ i = (\tau _{\geq -n}K^\bullet )^ i for n \gg 0 we see that we get a unique map \gamma : K^\bullet \to I^\bullet such that the diagrams

\xymatrix{ K^\bullet \ar[r] \ar[d]_\gamma & \tau _{\geq -n} K^\bullet \ar[d] \\ I^\bullet \ar[r] & I_ n^\bullet }

commute. It follows that \gamma is a map of complexes which represents the map c : K^\bullet \to R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \tau _{\geq -n}K^\bullet of Remark 13.34.4 in D(\mathcal{A}). In other words, the diagram

\xymatrix{ K^\bullet \ar[r]_-c \ar[d]_\gamma & R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \tau _{\geq -n} K^\bullet \ar[d]^{\cong } \\ I^\bullet \ar[r]^-{\cong } & R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits I_ n^\bullet }

is commutative in D(\mathcal{A}). The lemma follows. \square


Comments (1)

Comment #2463 by anonymous on

In item (2) of the lemma it should be and not .

There are also:

  • 3 comment(s) on Section 13.34: Derived limits

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.