Lemma 103.9.3. Let \tau \in \{ {\acute{e}tale}, fppf\} . Let \mathcal{X} be an algebraic stack. Let \mathcal{F} be a parasitic object of \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{X}_\tau , \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}).
H^ i_\tau (\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{F}) = 0 for all i.
Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a morphism of algebraic stacks. Then R^ if_*\mathcal{F} (computed in \tau -topology) is a parasitic object of \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{Y}_\tau , \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {Y}).
Proof.
We first reduce (2) to (1). By Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.21.2 we see that R^ if_*\mathcal{F} is the sheaf associated to the presheaf
y \longmapsto H^ i_\tau \Big(V \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}} \mathcal{X}, \ \text{pr}^{-1}\mathcal{F}\Big)
Here y is a typical object of \mathcal{Y} lying over the scheme V. By Lemma 103.9.2 it suffices to show that these cohomology groups are zero when y : V \to \mathcal{Y} is flat. Note that \text{pr} : V \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}} \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X} is flat as a base change of y. Hence by Lemma 103.9.2 we see that \text{pr}^{-1}\mathcal{F} is parasitic. Thus it suffices to prove (1).
To see (1) we can use the spectral sequence of Sheaves on Stacks, Proposition 96.20.1 to reduce this to the case where \mathcal{X} is an algebraic stack representable by an algebraic space. Note that in the spectral sequence each f_ p^{-1}\mathcal{F} = f_ p^*\mathcal{F} is a parasitic module by Lemma 103.9.2 because the morphisms f_ p : \mathcal{U}_ p = \mathcal{U} \times _\mathcal {X} \ldots \times _\mathcal {X} \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X} are flat. Reusing this spectral sequence one more time (as in the proof of Lemma 103.5.1) we reduce to the case where the algebraic stack \mathcal{X} is representable by a scheme X. Then H^ i_\tau (\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{F}) = H^ i((\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau , \mathcal{F}). In this case the vanishing follows easily from an argument with Čech coverings, see Descent, Lemma 35.12.2.
\square
Comments (0)