Lemma 16.5.2. Let $R \to \Lambda $ be a ring map. Let $I \subset R$ be an ideal. Assume that
$I^2 = 0$,
$\Lambda /I\Lambda $ is a filtered colimit of smooth $R/I$-algebras, and
$R \to \Lambda $ is flat.
Let $\varphi : B \to \Lambda $ be an $R$-algebra map with $B$ smooth over $R$. Let $J \subset IB$ be a finitely generated ideal such that $\varphi (J) = 0$. Then there exists $R$-algebra maps
\[ B \xrightarrow {\alpha } B' \xrightarrow {\beta } \Lambda \]
such that $B'$ is smooth over $R$, such that $\alpha (J) = 0$ and such that $\beta \circ \alpha = \varphi \bmod I\Lambda $.
Proof.
If we can prove the lemma in case $J = (h)$, then we can prove the lemma by induction on the number of generators of $J$. Namely, suppose that $J$ can be generated by $n$ elements $h_1, \ldots , h_ n$ and the lemma holds for all cases where $J$ is generated by $n - 1$ elements. Then we apply the case $n = 1$ to produce $B \to B' \to \Lambda $ where the first map kills of $h_ n$. Then we let $J'$ be the ideal of $B'$ generated by the images of $h_1, \ldots , h_{n - 1}$ and we apply the case for $n - 1$ to produce $B' \to B'' \to \Lambda $. It is easy to verify that $B \to B'' \to \Lambda $ does the job.
Assume $J = (h)$ and write $h = \sum \epsilon _ i b_ i$ for some $\epsilon _ i \in I$ and $b_ i \in B$. Note that $0 = \varphi (h) = \sum \epsilon _ i \varphi (b_ i)$. As $\Lambda $ is flat over $R$, the equational criterion for flatness (Algebra, Lemma 10.39.11) implies that we can find $\lambda _ j \in \Lambda $, $j = 1, \ldots , m$ and $a_{ij} \in R$ such that $\varphi (b_ i) = \sum _ j a_{ij} \lambda _ j$ and $\sum _ i \epsilon _ i a_{ij} = 0$. Set
\[ C = B[x_1, \ldots , x_ m]/(b_ i - \sum a_{ij} x_ j) \]
with $C \to \Lambda $ given by $\varphi $ and $x_ j \mapsto \lambda _ j$. Choose a factorization
\[ C \to B'/J' \to \Lambda \]
as in Lemma 16.5.1. Since $B$ is smooth over $R$ we can lift the map $B \to C \to B'/J'$ to a map $\psi : B \to B'$. We claim that $\psi (h) = 0$. Namely, the fact that $\psi $ agrees with $B \to C \to B'/J'$ mod $I$ implies that
\[ \psi (b_ i) = \sum a_{ij} \xi _ j + \theta _ i \]
for some $\xi _ i \in B'$ and $\theta _ i \in IB'$. Hence we see that
\[ \psi (h) = \psi (\sum \epsilon _ i b_ i) = \sum \epsilon _ i a_{ij} \xi _ j + \sum \epsilon _ i \theta _ i = 0 \]
because of the relations above and the fact that $I^2 = 0$.
$\square$
Comments (2)
Comment #4044 by Kęstutis Česnavičius on
Comment #4134 by Johan on