The Stacks project

23.3 Divided power rings

There is a category of divided power rings. Here is the definition.

Definition 23.3.1. A divided power ring is a triple $(A, I, \gamma )$ where $A$ is a ring, $I \subset A$ is an ideal, and $\gamma = (\gamma _ n)_{n \geq 1}$ is a divided power structure on $I$. A homomorphism of divided power rings $\varphi : (A, I, \gamma ) \to (B, J, \delta )$ is a ring homomorphism $\varphi : A \to B$ such that $\varphi (I) \subset J$ and such that $\delta _ n(\varphi (x)) = \varphi (\gamma _ n(x))$ for all $x \in I$ and $n \geq 1$.

We sometimes say “let $(B, J, \delta )$ be a divided power algebra over $(A, I, \gamma )$” to indicate that $(B, J, \delta )$ is a divided power ring which comes equipped with a homomorphism of divided power rings $(A, I, \gamma ) \to (B, J, \delta )$.

Lemma 23.3.2. The category of divided power rings has all limits and they agree with limits in the category of rings.

Proof. The empty limit is the zero ring (that's weird but we need it). The product of a collection of divided power rings $(A_ t, I_ t, \gamma _ t)$, $t \in T$ is given by $(\prod A_ t, \prod I_ t, \gamma )$ where $\gamma _ n((x_ t)) = (\gamma _{t, n}(x_ t))$. The equalizer of $\alpha , \beta : (A, I, \gamma ) \to (B, J, \delta )$ is just $C = \{ a \in A \mid \alpha (a) = \beta (a)\} $ with ideal $C \cap I$ and induced divided powers. It follows that all limits exist, see Categories, Lemma 4.14.11. $\square$

The following lemma illustrates a very general category theoretic phenomenon in the case of divided power algebras.

Lemma 23.3.3. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the category of divided power rings. Let $F : \mathcal{C} \to \textit{Sets}$ be a functor. Assume that

  1. there exists a cardinal $\kappa $ such that for every $f \in F(A, I, \gamma )$ there exists a morphism $(A', I', \gamma ') \to (A, I, \gamma )$ of $\mathcal{C}$ such that $f$ is the image of $f' \in F(A', I', \gamma ')$ and $|A'| \leq \kappa $, and

  2. $F$ commutes with limits.

Then $F$ is representable, i.e., there exists an object $(B, J, \delta )$ of $\mathcal{C}$ such that

\[ F(A, I, \gamma ) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}((B, J, \delta ), (A, I, \gamma )) \]

functorially in $(A, I, \gamma )$.

Proof. This is a special case of Categories, Lemma 4.25.1. $\square$

Lemma 23.3.4. The category of divided power rings has all colimits.

Proof. The empty colimit is $\mathbf{Z}$ with divided power ideal $(0)$. Let's discuss general colimits. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category and let $c \mapsto (A_ c, I_ c, \gamma _ c)$ be a diagram. Consider the functor

\[ F(B, J, \delta ) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{c \in \mathcal{C}} Hom((A_ c, I_ c, \gamma _ c), (B, J, \delta )) \]

Note that any $f = (f_ c)_{c \in C} \in F(B, J, \delta )$ has the property that all the images $f_ c(A_ c)$ generate a subring $B'$ of $B$ of bounded cardinality $\kappa $ and that all the images $f_ c(I_ c)$ generate a divided power sub ideal $J'$ of $B'$. And we get a factorization of $f$ as a $f'$ in $F(B')$ followed by the inclusion $B' \to B$. Also, $F$ commutes with limits. Hence we may apply Lemma 23.3.3 to see that $F$ is representable and we win. $\square$

Remark 23.3.5. The forgetful functor $(A, I, \gamma ) \mapsto A$ does not commute with colimits. For example, let

\[ \xymatrix{ (B, J, \delta ) \ar[r] & (B'', J'', \delta '') \\ (A, I, \gamma ) \ar[r] \ar[u] & (B', J', \delta ') \ar[u] } \]

be a pushout in the category of divided power rings. Then in general the map $B \otimes _ A B' \to B''$ isn't an isomorphism. (It is always surjective.) An explicit example is given by $(A, I, \gamma ) = (\mathbf{Z}, (0), \emptyset )$, $(B, J, \delta ) = (\mathbf{Z}/4\mathbf{Z}, 2\mathbf{Z}/4\mathbf{Z}, \delta )$, and $(B', J', \delta ') = (\mathbf{Z}/4\mathbf{Z}, 2\mathbf{Z}/4\mathbf{Z}, \delta ')$ where $\delta _2(2) = 2$ and $\delta '_2(2) = 0$. More precisely, using Lemma 23.5.3 we let $\delta $, resp. $\delta '$ be the unique divided power structure on $J$, resp. $J'$ such that $\delta _2 : J \to J$, resp. $\delta '_2 : J' \to J'$ is the map $0 \mapsto 0, 2 \mapsto 2$, resp. $0 \mapsto 0, 2 \mapsto 0$. Then $(B'', J'', \delta '') = (\mathbf{F}_2, (0), \emptyset )$ which doesn't agree with the tensor product. However, note that it is always true that

\[ B''/J'' = B/J \otimes _{A/I} B'/J' \]

as can be seen from the universal property of the pushout by considering maps into divided power algebras of the form $(C, (0), \emptyset )$.

Comments (2)

Comment #7084 by Samuel Tiersma on

In Remark 07GY, the definition of should be if and if . For divided power axiom (5) implies for , so by induction for all .

Comment #7085 by on

Hi, if you navigate to the page of Remark 23.3.5 you will see that we discussed this there. Please always leave your comment on the smallest unit possible.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07GT. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.