The Stacks project

Lemma 15.46.5. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$. Let $\{ x_ i\} _{i \in I}$ be a $p$-basis for $k$. Let $n, m \geq 0$. Let $K$ be the fraction field of $A = k[[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]][y_1, \ldots , y_ m]$. Let $J$ be a finite subset of $I$. Consider the subfield subfield $k/k_ J/k^ p$ generated by $k^ p$ and $x_ i$ with $i \in I \setminus J$. The fraction fields $K_ J$ of

\[ A_ J = k_ J[[x_1^ p, \ldots , x_ n^ p]][y_1^ p, \ldots , y_ m^ p] \]

form a family of subfields of $K$ as in Lemma 15.46.4. Moreover, each of the ring extensions $A_ J \subset A$ is finite.

Proof. Since $k/k_ J$ is finite, the ring extension $k_ J[[x_1^ p, \ldots , x_ d^ p]] \subset k[[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]]$ is finite by Algebra, Lemma 10.97.7. This implies that $A_ J \to A$ is finite.

Let us check properties (1), (2), (3) of Lemma 15.46.4. Proof of (1). For $a \in A$ we see that $a^ p \in A_ J$. Hence $K^ p \subset K_ J$. Proof of (2). Suppose that $f/g^ p \in K$, $f, g \in A$, $g \not= 0$ is contained in $K_ J$ for every choice of $J$. Fix $J$ for the moment. Since $f/g^ p \in K_ J$ we can write $f/g^ p = a/b^ p$ with $a \in A_ J$ and $b \in A$ nonzero. Hence $b^ p f \in A_ J$. For any $A_ J$-derivation $D : A \to A$ we see that $0 = D(b^ pf) = b^ p D(f)$ hence $D(f) = 0$ as $A$ is a domain. Taking $D = \partial _{x_ i}$ and $D = \partial _{y_ j}$ we conclude that $f \in k[[x_1^ p, \ldots , x_ n^ p]][y_1^ p, \ldots , y_ d^ p]$. Applying a $k_ J$-derivation $\theta : k \to k$ we similarly conclude that all coefficients of $f$ are in $k_ J$, i.e., $f \in A_ J$. Since it is clear that $A^ p = \bigcap \nolimits _ J A_ J$ where $J$ ranges over all subfields as in the lemma we conclude $f \in A^ p$ as desired. Proof of (3). This is clear because $K_{J \cup J'} \subset K_ J \cap K_{J'}$. $\square$


Comments (7)

Comment #3536 by Dario Weißmann on

Missing punctuation in the third sentence of the statement.

Comment #4292 by Bogdan on

Let K be the fraction field of should read .

I guess (the last line) should read .

Comment #9997 by Branislav Sobot on

I am failing to see why is the condition (3) of lemma 07P4 satisfied for such intermediate fields . I found that in characteristic zero intersection of two subfields of finite index isn't always of finite index, but I guess in positive characteristic we are suppose to use -basis of somehow. Alternatively, I think one can fix a -basis and use the family of intermediate fields , instead of your family .

Comment #9998 by Branislav Sobot on

The family which didn't compile was consisted of intermediate fields generated by s where for various finite .

There are also:

  • 5 comment(s) on Section 15.46: Field extensions, revisited

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07P5. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.