Definition 33.35.7. Let k be a field. Let n \geq 0. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on \mathbf{P}^ n_ k. We say \mathcal{F} is m-regular if
for i = 1, \ldots , n.
Here is the definition.
Definition 33.35.7. Let k be a field. Let n \geq 0. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on \mathbf{P}^ n_ k. We say \mathcal{F} is m-regular if
for i = 1, \ldots , n.
Note that \mathcal{F} = \mathcal{O}(d) is m-regular if and only if d \geq -m. This follows from the computation of cohomology groups in Cohomology of Schemes, Equation (30.8.1.1). Namely, we see that H^ n(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{O}(d)) = 0 if and only if d \geq -n.
Lemma 33.35.8. Let k'/k be an extension of fields. Let n \geq 0. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on \mathbf{P}^ n_ k. Let \mathcal{F}' be the pullback of \mathcal{F} to \mathbf{P}^ n_{k'}. Then \mathcal{F} is m-regular if and only if \mathcal{F}' is m-regular.
Proof. This is true because
by flat base change, see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2. \square
Lemma 33.35.9. In the situation of Lemma 33.35.3, if \mathcal{F} is m-regular, then \mathcal{G} is m-regular on H \cong \mathbf{P}^{n - 1}_ k.
Proof. Recall that H^ i(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, i_*\mathcal{G}) = H^ i(H, \mathcal{G}) by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.2.4. Hence we see that for i \geq 1 we get
by Remark 33.35.5. The lemma follows. \square
Lemma 33.35.10. Let k be a field. Let n \geq 0. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on \mathbf{P}^ n_ k. If \mathcal{F} is m-regular, then \mathcal{F} is (m + 1)-regular.
Proof. We prove this by induction on n. If n = 0 every sheaf is m-regular for all m and there is nothing to prove. By Lemma 33.35.8 we may replace k by an infinite overfield and assume k is infinite. Thus we may apply Lemma 33.35.3. By Lemma 33.35.9 we know that \mathcal{G} is m-regular. By induction on n we see that \mathcal{G} is (m + 1)-regular. Considering the long exact cohomology sequence associated to the sequence
as in Remark 33.35.5 the reader easily deduces for i \geq 1 the vanishing of H^ i(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}(m + 1 - i)) from the (known) vanishing of H^ i(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}(m - i)) and H^ i(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{G}(m + 1 - i)). \square
Lemma 33.35.11. Let k be a field. Let n \geq 0. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on \mathbf{P}^ n_ k. If \mathcal{F} is m-regular, then the multiplication map
is surjective.
Proof. Let k'/k be an extension of fields. Let \mathcal{F}' be as in Lemma 33.35.8. By Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2 the base change of the linear map of the lemma to k' is the same linear map for the sheaf \mathcal{F}'. Since k \to k' is faithfully flat it suffices to prove the lemma over k', i.e., we may assume k is infinite.
Assume k is infinite. We prove the lemma by induction on n. The case n = 0 is trivial as \mathcal{O}(1) \cong \mathcal{O} is generated by T_0. For n > 0 apply Lemma 33.35.3 and tensor the sequence by \mathcal{O}(m + 1) to get
see Remark 33.35.5. Let t \in H^0(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}(m + 1)). By induction the image \overline{t} \in H^0(H, \mathcal{G}(m + 1)) is the image of \sum g_ i \otimes \overline{s}_ i with \overline{s}_ i \in \Gamma (H, \mathcal{O}(1)) and g_ i \in H^0(H, \mathcal{G}(m)). Since \mathcal{F} is m-regular we have H^1(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}(m - 1)) = 0, hence long exact cohomology sequence associated to the short exact sequence
shows we can lift g_ i to f_ i \in H^0(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}(m)). We can also lift \overline{s}_ i to s_ i \in H^0(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{O}(1)) (see proof of Lemma 33.35.2 for example). After subtracting the image of \sum f_ i \otimes s_ i from t we see that we may assume \overline{t} = 0. But this exactly means that t is the image of f \otimes s for some f \in H^0(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}(m)) as desired. \square
Lemma 33.35.12. Let k be a field. Let n \geq 0. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on \mathbf{P}^ n_ k. If \mathcal{F} is m-regular, then \mathcal{F}(m) is globally generated.
Proof. For all d \gg 0 the sheaf \mathcal{F}(d) is globally generated. This follows for example from the first part of Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.14.1. Pick d \geq m such that \mathcal{F}(d) is globally generated. Choose a basis f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in H^0(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}). By Lemma 33.35.11 every element f \in H^0(\mathbf{P}^ n_ k, \mathcal{F}(d)) can be written as f = \sum P_ if_ i for some P_ i \in k[T_0, \ldots , T_ n] homogeneous of degree d - m. Since the sections f generate \mathcal{F}(d) it follows that the sections f_ i generate \mathcal{F}(m). \square
Comments (0)
There are also: