Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 36.10.4. Let X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) be an affine scheme. Let M^\bullet be a complex of A-modules and let E be the corresponding object of D(\mathcal{O}_ X). Then

  1. E has tor amplitude in [a, b] if and only if M^\bullet has tor amplitude in [a, b].

  2. E has finite tor dimension if and only if M^\bullet has finite tor dimension.

Proof. Part (2) follows trivially from part (1). In the proof of (1) we will use the equivalence D(A) = D_\mathit{QCoh}(X) of Lemma 36.3.5 without further mention. Assume M^\bullet has tor amplitude in [a, b]. Then K^\bullet is isomorphic in D(A) to a complex K^\bullet of flat A-modules with K^ i = 0 for i \not\in [a, b], see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.66.3. Then E is isomorphic to \widetilde{K^\bullet }. Since each \widetilde{K^ i} is a flat \mathcal{O}_ X-module, we see that E has tor amplitude in [a, b] by Cohomology, Lemma 20.48.3.

Assume that E has tor amplitude in [a, b]. Then E is bounded whence M^\bullet is in K^-(A). Thus we may replace M^\bullet by a bounded above complex of A-modules. We may even choose a projective resolution and assume that M^\bullet is a bounded above complex of free A-modules. Then for any A-module N we have

E \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} \widetilde{N} \cong \widetilde{M^\bullet } \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} \widetilde{N} \cong \widetilde{M^\bullet \otimes _ A N}

in D(\mathcal{O}_ X). Thus the vanishing of cohomology sheaves of the left hand side implies M^\bullet has tor amplitude in [a, b]. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.