Proof.
Part (2) follows trivially from part (1). In the proof of (1) we will use the equivalence D(A) = D_\mathit{QCoh}(X) of Lemma 36.3.5 without further mention. Assume M^\bullet has tor amplitude in [a, b]. Then K^\bullet is isomorphic in D(A) to a complex K^\bullet of flat A-modules with K^ i = 0 for i \not\in [a, b], see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.66.3. Then E is isomorphic to \widetilde{K^\bullet }. Since each \widetilde{K^ i} is a flat \mathcal{O}_ X-module, we see that E has tor amplitude in [a, b] by Cohomology, Lemma 20.48.3.
Assume that E has tor amplitude in [a, b]. Then E is bounded whence M^\bullet is in K^-(A). Thus we may replace M^\bullet by a bounded above complex of A-modules. We may even choose a projective resolution and assume that M^\bullet is a bounded above complex of free A-modules. Then for any A-module N we have
E \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} \widetilde{N} \cong \widetilde{M^\bullet } \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} \widetilde{N} \cong \widetilde{M^\bullet \otimes _ A N}
in D(\mathcal{O}_ X). Thus the vanishing of cohomology sheaves of the left hand side implies M^\bullet has tor amplitude in [a, b].
\square
Comments (0)