Lemma 36.3.5. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be an affine scheme. All the functors in the diagram
are equivalences of triangulated categories. Moreover, for $E$ in $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ we have $H^0(X, E) = H^0(X, H^0(E))$.
Lemma 36.3.5. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be an affine scheme. All the functors in the diagram
are equivalences of triangulated categories. Moreover, for $E$ in $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ we have $H^0(X, E) = H^0(X, H^0(E))$.
Proof. The functor $R\Gamma (X, -)$ gives a functor $D(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to D(A)$ and hence by restriction a functor
We will show this functor is quasi-inverse to (36.3.0.1) via the equivalence between quasi-coherent modules on $X$ and the category of $A$-modules.
Elucidation. Denote $(Y, \mathcal{O}_ Y)$ the one point space with sheaf of rings given by $A$. Denote $\pi : (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) \to (Y, \mathcal{O}_ Y)$ the obvious morphism of ringed spaces. Then $R\Gamma (X, -)$ can be identified with $R\pi _*$ and the functor (36.3.0.1) via the equivalence $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}_ Y) = \text{Mod}_ A = \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ can be identified with $L\pi ^* = \pi ^* = \widetilde{\ }$ (see Modules, Lemma 17.10.5 and Schemes, Lemmas 26.7.1 and 26.7.5). Thus the functors
are adjoint (by Cohomology, Lemma 20.28.1). In particular we obtain canonical adjunction mappings
for $E$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and
for $M^\bullet $ a complex of $A$-modules.
Let $E$ be an object of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. We may apply Lemma 36.3.4 to the functor $F(-) = \Gamma (X, -)$ with $N = 1$ by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.2.2. Hence
(the last equality by definition of the canonical truncation). Using this we will show that the adjunction mappings $a$ and $b$ induce isomorphisms $H^0(a)$ and $H^0(b)$. Thus $a$ and $b$ are quasi-isomorphisms (as the statement is invariant under shifts) and the lemma is proved.
In both cases we use that $\widetilde{\ }$ is an exact functor (Schemes, Lemma 26.5.4). Namely, this implies that
which is equal to $H^0(E)$ because $H^0(E)$ is quasi-coherent. Thus $H^0(a)$ is an isomorphism. For the other direction we have
which proves that $H^0(b)$ is an isomorphism. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)