The Stacks project

The formation of the naive cotangent complex commutes with localization at an element.

Lemma 10.134.12. Let $A \to B$ be a ring map. Let $g \in B$. Suppose $\alpha : P \to B$ is a presentation with kernel $I$. Then a presentation of $B_ g$ over $A$ is the map

\[ \beta : P[x] \longrightarrow B_ g \]

extending $\alpha $ and sending $x$ to $1/g$. The kernel $J$ of $\beta $ is generated by $I$ and the element $f x - 1$ where $f \in P$ is an element mapped to $g \in B$ by $\alpha $. In this situation we have

  1. $J/J^2 = (I/I^2)_ g \oplus B_ g (f x - 1)$,

  2. $\Omega _{P[x]/A} \otimes _{P[x]} B_ g = \Omega _{P/A} \otimes _ P B_ g \oplus B_ g \text{d}x$,

  3. $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits (\beta ) \cong \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits (\alpha ) \otimes _ B B_ g \oplus (B_ g \xrightarrow {g} B_ g)$

Hence the canonical map $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A} \otimes _ B B_ g \to \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B_ g/A}$ is a homotopy equivalence.

Proof. Since $P[x]/(I, fx - 1) = B[x]/(gx - 1) = B_ g$ we get the statement about $I$ and $fx - 1$ generating $J$. Consider the commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ 0 \ar[r] & \Omega _{P/A} \otimes B_ g \ar[r] & \Omega _{P[x]/A} \otimes B_ g \ar[r] & \Omega _{B[x]/B} \otimes B_ g \ar[r] & 0 \\ & (I/I^2)_ g \ar[r] \ar[u] & J/J^2 \ar[r] \ar[u] & (gx - 1)/(gx - 1)^2 \ar[r] \ar[u] & 0 } \]

with exact rows of Lemma 10.134.4. The $B_ g$-module $\Omega _{B[x]/B} \otimes B_ g$ is free of rank $1$ on $\text{d}x$. The element $\text{d}x$ in the $B_ g$-module $\Omega _{P[x]/A} \otimes B_ g$ provides a splitting for the top row. The element $gx - 1 \in (gx - 1)/(gx - 1)^2$ is mapped to $g\text{d}x$ in $\Omega _{B[x]/B} \otimes B_ g$ and hence $(gx - 1)/(gx - 1)^2$ is free of rank $1$ over $B_ g$. (This can also be seen by arguing that $gx - 1$ is a nonzerodivisor in $B[x]$ because it is a polynomial with invertible constant term and any nonzerodivisor gives a quasi-regular sequence of length $1$ by Lemma 10.69.2.)

Let us prove $(I/I^2)_ g \to J/J^2$ injective. Consider the $P$-algebra map

\[ \pi : P[x] \to (P/I^2)_ f = P_ f/I_ f^2 \]

sending $x$ to $1/f$. Since $J$ is generated by $I$ and $fx - 1$ we see that $\pi (J) \subset (I/I^2)_ f = (I/I^2)_ g$. Since this is an ideal of square zero we see that $\pi (J^2) = 0$. If $a \in I$ maps to an element of $J^2$ in $J$, then $\pi (a) = 0$, which implies that $a$ maps to zero in $I_ f/I_ f^2$. This proves the desired injectivity.

Thus we have a short exact sequence of two term complexes

\[ 0 \to \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits (\alpha ) \otimes _ B B_ g \to \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits (\beta ) \to (B_ g \xrightarrow {g} B_ g) \to 0 \]

Such a short exact sequence can always be split in the category of complexes. In our particular case we can take as splittings

\[ J/J^2 = (I/I^2)_ g \oplus B_ g (fx - 1)\quad \text{and}\quad \Omega _{P[x]/A} \otimes B_ g = \Omega _{P/A} \otimes B_ g \oplus B_ g (g^{-2}\text{d}f + \text{d}x) \]

This works because $\text{d}(fx - 1) = x\text{d}f + f \text{d}x = g(g^{-2}\text{d}f + \text{d}x)$ in $\Omega _{P[x]/A} \otimes B_ g$. $\square$

Comments (9)

Comment #701 by Keenan Kidwell on

In the fourth sentence of the statement of the lemma, should be .

Comment #703 by on

Thank you very much for all the comments. As of now, the last batch of fixes can be found in this commit. I intend to update the stacks project later today so then you should be able to see the changes reflected online as well.

Comment #850 by Bhargav Bhatt on

Suggested slogan: The formation of the naive cotangent complex commutes with localization at an element.

Comment #1514 by Rob Roy on

There's an error in the argument for injectivity of , because in the short exact sequence , really represents a non-free quotient of (annihilated by ); so the last sentence of the proof is false. Here's a different argument. It is enough to show that where is the obvious map . So consider the extension of to the P-algebra map given by , and note that , since implies .

Comment #1531 by on

Thanks very much. There is a generalization of this proof (the correct one you give) in the proof of Lemma 15.33. Here is the commit.

Comment #1951 by Brian Conrad on

Perhaps mention that is not a zero-divisor (easy calculation beginning at constant terms), so is a free module (of rank 1) over . This freeness over is implicitly used in the use of the present result in the proof of Tag 07CF.

Comment #2006 by on

OK, I added your remark and I tried to explain the proof better one more time, see here. But I think there is a curse on this lemma which prevents it from being explained clearly.

Comment #7193 by Paolo on

Shouldn't point (1) say ?

Comment #7195 by on

The in part (1) means the element of which is the image of and the in front of it means that this element gives a free summand; see also discussion in the proof of the lemma. OTOH is a quotient module of so I think it would be less clear to write that here.

There are also:

  • 11 comment(s) on Section 10.134: The naive cotangent complex

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 08JZ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.