Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 59.77.7. Let X be a connected scheme. Let \Lambda be a Noetherian ring. Let K \in D_{ctf}(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) have locally constant cohomology sheaves. Then there exists a finite complex of finite projective \Lambda -modules M^\bullet and an étale covering \{ U_ i \to X\} such that K|_{U_ i} \cong \underline{M^\bullet }|_{U_ i} in D(U_{i, {\acute{e}tale}}, \Lambda ).

Proof. Choose an étale covering \{ U_ i \to X\} such that K|_{U_ i} is constant, say K|_{U_ i} \cong \underline{M_ i^\bullet }_{U_ i} for some finite complex of finite \Lambda -modules M_ i^\bullet . See Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.53.1. Observe that U_ i \times _ X U_ j is empty if M_ i^\bullet is not isomorphic to M_ j^\bullet in D(\Lambda ). For each complex of \Lambda -modules M^\bullet let I_{M^\bullet } = \{ i \in I \mid M_ i^\bullet \cong M^\bullet \text{ in }D(\Lambda )\} . As étale morphisms are open we see that U_{M^\bullet } = \bigcup _{i \in I_{M^\bullet }} \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(U_ i \to X) is an open subset of X. Then X = \coprod U_{M^\bullet } is a disjoint open covering of X. As X is connected only one U_{M^\bullet } is nonempty. As K is in D_{ctf}(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) we see that M^\bullet is a perfect complex of \Lambda -modules, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.74.2. Hence we may assume M^\bullet is a finite complex of finite projective \Lambda -modules. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.