The Stacks project

9.24 Kummer extensions

Let $K$ be a field. Let $n \geq 2$ be an integer such that $K$ contains a primitive $n$th root of $1$. Let $a \in K$. Let $L$ be an extension of $K$ obtained by adjoining a root $b$ of the equation $x^ n = a$. Then $L/K$ is Galois. If $G = \text{Gal}(L/K)$ is the Galois group, then the map

\[ G \longrightarrow \mu _ n(K),\quad \sigma \longmapsto \sigma (b)/b \]

is an injective homomorphism of groups. In particular, $G$ is cyclic of order dividing $n$ as a subgroup of the cyclic group $\mu _ n(K)$. Kummer theory gives a converse.

Lemma 9.24.1 (Kummer extensions). Let $L/K$ be a Galois extension of fields whose Galois group is $\mathbf{Z}/n\mathbf{Z}$. Assume moreover that the characteristic of $K$ is prime to $n$ and that $K$ contains a primitive $n$th root of $1$. Then $L = K[z]$ with $z^ n \in K$.

Proof. Let $\zeta \in K$ be a primitive $n$th root of $1$. Let $\sigma $ be a generator of $\text{Gal}(L/K)$. Consider $\sigma : L \to L$ as a $K$-linear operator. Note that $\sigma ^ n - 1 = 0$ as a linear operator. Applying linear independence of characters (Lemma 9.13.1), we see that there cannot be a polynomial over $K$ of degree $< n$ annihilating $\sigma $. Hence the minimal polynomial of $\sigma $ as a linear operator is $x^ n - 1$. Since $\zeta $ is a root of $x^ n - 1$ by linear algebra there is a $0 \neq z \in L$ such that $\sigma (z) = \zeta z$. This $z$ satisfies $z^ n \in K$ because $\sigma (z^ n) = (\zeta z)^ n = z^ n$. Moreover, we see that $z, \sigma (z), \ldots , \sigma ^{n - 1}(z) = z, \zeta z, \ldots \zeta ^{n - 1} z$ are pairwise distinct which guarantees that $z$ generates $L$ over $K$. Hence $L = K[z]$ as required. $\square$

Lemma 9.24.2. Let $K$ be a field with algebraic closure $\overline{K}$. Let $p$ be a prime different from the characteristic of $K$. Let $\zeta \in \overline{K}$ be a primitive $p$th root of $1$. Then $K(\zeta )/K$ is a Galois extension of degree dividing $p - 1$.

Proof. The polynomial $x^ p - 1$ splits completely over $K(\zeta )$ as its roots are $1, \zeta , \zeta ^2, \ldots , \zeta ^{p - 1}$. Hence $K(\zeta )/K$ is a splitting field and hence normal. The extension is separable as $x^ p - 1$ is a separable polynomial. Thus the extension is Galois. Any automorphism of $K(\zeta )$ over $K$ sends $\zeta $ to $\zeta ^ i$ for some $1 \leq i \leq p - 1$. Thus the Galois group is a subgroup of $(\mathbf{Z}/p\mathbf{Z})^*$. $\square$

Lemma 9.24.3. Let $K$ be a field. Let $L/K$ be a finite extension of degree $e$ which is generated by an element $\alpha $ with $a = \alpha ^ e \in K$. Then any sub extension $L/L'/K$ is generated by $\alpha ^ d$ for some $d | e$.

Proof. Observe that for $d | e$ the subfield $K(\alpha ^ d)$ has $[K(\alpha ^ d) : K] = e/d$ and $[L : K(\alpha ^ d)] = d$ and that both extensions $K(\alpha ^ d)/K$ and $L/K(\alpha ^ d)$ are extensions as in the lemma.

We will use induction on the pair of integers $([L : L'], [L' : K])$ ordered lexicographically. Let $p$ be a prime number dividing $e$ and set $d = e/p$. If $K(\alpha ^ d)$ is contained in $L'$, then we win by induction, because then it suffices to prove the lemma for $L/L'/K(\alpha ^ d)$. If not, then $[L'(\alpha ^ d) : L'] = p$ and by induction hypothesis we have $L'(\alpha ^ d) = K(\alpha ^ i)$ for some $i | d$. If $i \not= 1$ we are done by induction. Thus we may assume that $[L : L'] = p$.

If $e$ is not a power of $p$, then we can do this trick again with a second prime number and we win. Thus we may assume $e$ is a power of $p$.

If the characteristic of $K$ is $p$ and $e$ is a $p$th power, then $L/K$ is purely inseparable. Hence $L/L'$ is purely inseparable of degree $p$ and hence $\alpha ^ p \in L'$. Thus $L' = K(\alpha ^ p)$ and this case is done.

The final case is where $e$ is a power of $p$, the characteristic of $K$ is not $p$, $L/L'$ is a degree $p$ extension, and $L = L'(\alpha ^{e/p})$. Claim: this can only happen if $e = p$ and $L' = K$. The claim finishes the proof.

First, we prove the claim when $K$ contains a primitive $p$th root of unity $\zeta $. In this case the degree $p$ extension $K(\alpha ^{e/p})/K$ is Galois with Galois group generated by the automorphism $\alpha ^{e/p} \mapsto \zeta \alpha ^{e/p}$. On the other hand, since $L$ is generated by $\alpha ^{e/p}$ and $L'$ we see that the map

\[ K(\alpha ^{e/p}) \otimes _ K L' \longrightarrow L \]

is an isomorphism of $K$-algebras (look at dimensions). Thus $L$ has an automorphism $\sigma $ of order $p$ over $K$ sending $\alpha ^{e/p}$ to $\zeta \alpha ^{e/p}$. Then $\sigma (\alpha ) = \zeta ' \alpha $ for some $e$th root of unity $\zeta '$ (as $\alpha ^ e$ is in $K$). Then on the one hand $(\zeta ')^{e/p} = \zeta $ and on the other hand $\zeta '$ has to be a $p$th root of $1$ as $\sigma $ has order $p$. Thus $e/p = 1$ and the claim has been shown.

Finally, suppose that $K$ does not contain a primitive $p$th root of $1$. Choose a primitive $p$th root $\zeta $ in some algebraic closure $\overline{L}$ of $L$. Consider the diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ K(\zeta ) \ar[r] & L(\zeta ) \\ K \ar[u] \ar[r] & L \ar[u] } \]

By Lemma 9.24.2 the vertical extensions have degree prime to $p$. Hence $[L(\zeta ) : K(\zeta )]$ is divisible by $e$. On the other hand, $L(\zeta )$ is generated by $\alpha $ over $K(\zeta )$ and hence $[L(\zeta ) : K(\zeta )] \leq e$. Thus $[L(\zeta ) : K(\zeta )] = e$. Similarly we have $[K(\alpha ^{e/p}, \zeta ) : K(\zeta )] = p$ and $[L(\zeta ) : L'(\zeta )] = p$. Thus the fields $K(\zeta ), L'(\zeta ), L(\zeta )$ and the element $\alpha $ fall into the case discussed in the previous paragraph we conclude $e = p$ as desired. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #4859 by Weixiao Lu on

Lemma 09DX, "which guarantees that generates over " instead of "which guarantees that generates over ".

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 09I6. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.