Lemma 36.7.4. Let X be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Suppose that for every affine open U \subset X the right derived functor
\Phi : D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) \to D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))
of the left exact functor j_* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) fits into a commutative diagram
\xymatrix{ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) \ar[d]_\Phi \ar[r]_{i_ U} & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) \ar[d]^{Rj_*} \\ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \ar[r]^{i_ X} & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) }
Then the functor (36.3.0.1)
D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \longrightarrow D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)
is an equivalence with quasi-inverse given by RQ_ X.
Proof.
Let E be an object of D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) and let A be an object of D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)). We have to show that the adjunction maps
RQ_ X(i_ X(A)) \to A \quad \text{and}\quad E \to i_ X(RQ_ X(E))
are isomorphisms. Consider the hypothesis H_ n: the adjunction maps above are isomorphisms whenever E and i_ X(A) are supported (Definition 36.6.1) on a closed subset of X which is contained in the union of n affine opens of X. We will prove H_ n by induction on n.
Base case: n = 0. In this case E = 0, hence the map E \to i_ X(RQ_ X(E)) is an isomorphism. Similarly i_ X(A) = 0. Thus the cohomology sheaves of i_ X(A) are zero. Since the inclusion functor \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}_ X) is fully faithful and exact, we conclude that the cohomology objects of A are zero, i.e., A = 0 and RQ_ X(i_ X(A)) \to A is an isomorphism as well.
Induction step. Suppose that E and i_ X(A) are supported on a closed subset T of X contained in U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ n with U_ i \subset X affine open. Set U = U_ n. Consider the distinguished triangles
A \to \Phi (A|_ U) \to A' \to A[1] \quad \text{and}\quad E \to Rj_*(E|_ U) \to E' \to E[1]
where \Phi is as in the statement of the lemma. Note that E \to Rj_*(E|_ U) is a quasi-isomorphism over U = U_ n. Since i_ X \circ \Phi = Rj_* \circ i_ U by assumption and since i_ X(A)|_ U = i_ U(A|_ U) we see that i_ X(A) \to i_ X(\Phi (A|_ U)) is a quasi-isomorphism over U. Hence i_ X(A') and E' are supported on the closed subset T \setminus U of X which is contained in U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_{n - 1}. By induction hypothesis the statement is true for A' and E'. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.4.3 it suffices to prove the maps
RQ_ X(i_ X(\Phi (A|_ U))) \to \Phi (A|_ U) \quad \text{and}\quad Rj_*(E|_ U) \to i_ X(RQ_ X(Rj_*E|_ U))
are isomorphisms. By assumption and by Lemma 36.7.2 (the inclusion morphism j : U \to X is flat, quasi-compact, and quasi-separated) we have
RQ_ X(i_ X(\Phi (A|_ U))) = RQ_ X(Rj_*(i_ U(A|_ U))) = \Phi (RQ_ U(i_ U(A|_ U)))
and
i_ X(RQ_ X(Rj_*(E|_ U))) = i_ X(\Phi (RQ_ U(E|_ U))) = Rj_*(i_ U(RQ_ U(E|_ U)))
Finally, the maps
RQ_ U(i_ U(A|_ U)) \to A|_ U \quad \text{and}\quad E|_ U \to i_ U(RQ_ U(E|_ U))
are isomorphisms by Lemma 36.7.3. The result follows.
\square
Comments (0)