Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 36.7.4. Let X be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Suppose that for every affine open U \subset X the right derived functor

\Phi : D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) \to D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))

of the left exact functor j_* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) fits into a commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) \ar[d]_\Phi \ar[r]_{i_ U} & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) \ar[d]^{Rj_*} \\ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \ar[r]^{i_ X} & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) }

Then the functor (36.3.0.1)

D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \longrightarrow D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)

is an equivalence with quasi-inverse given by RQ_ X.

Proof. Let E be an object of D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) and let A be an object of D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)). We have to show that the adjunction maps

RQ_ X(i_ X(A)) \to A \quad \text{and}\quad E \to i_ X(RQ_ X(E))

are isomorphisms. Consider the hypothesis H_ n: the adjunction maps above are isomorphisms whenever E and i_ X(A) are supported (Definition 36.6.1) on a closed subset of X which is contained in the union of n affine opens of X. We will prove H_ n by induction on n.

Base case: n = 0. In this case E = 0, hence the map E \to i_ X(RQ_ X(E)) is an isomorphism. Similarly i_ X(A) = 0. Thus the cohomology sheaves of i_ X(A) are zero. Since the inclusion functor \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}_ X) is fully faithful and exact, we conclude that the cohomology objects of A are zero, i.e., A = 0 and RQ_ X(i_ X(A)) \to A is an isomorphism as well.

Induction step. Suppose that E and i_ X(A) are supported on a closed subset T of X contained in U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ n with U_ i \subset X affine open. Set U = U_ n. Consider the distinguished triangles

A \to \Phi (A|_ U) \to A' \to A[1] \quad \text{and}\quad E \to Rj_*(E|_ U) \to E' \to E[1]

where \Phi is as in the statement of the lemma. Note that E \to Rj_*(E|_ U) is a quasi-isomorphism over U = U_ n. Since i_ X \circ \Phi = Rj_* \circ i_ U by assumption and since i_ X(A)|_ U = i_ U(A|_ U) we see that i_ X(A) \to i_ X(\Phi (A|_ U)) is a quasi-isomorphism over U. Hence i_ X(A') and E' are supported on the closed subset T \setminus U of X which is contained in U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_{n - 1}. By induction hypothesis the statement is true for A' and E'. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.4.3 it suffices to prove the maps

RQ_ X(i_ X(\Phi (A|_ U))) \to \Phi (A|_ U) \quad \text{and}\quad Rj_*(E|_ U) \to i_ X(RQ_ X(Rj_*E|_ U))

are isomorphisms. By assumption and by Lemma 36.7.2 (the inclusion morphism j : U \to X is flat, quasi-compact, and quasi-separated) we have

RQ_ X(i_ X(\Phi (A|_ U))) = RQ_ X(Rj_*(i_ U(A|_ U))) = \Phi (RQ_ U(i_ U(A|_ U)))

and

i_ X(RQ_ X(Rj_*(E|_ U))) = i_ X(\Phi (RQ_ U(E|_ U))) = Rj_*(i_ U(RQ_ U(E|_ U)))

Finally, the maps

RQ_ U(i_ U(A|_ U)) \to A|_ U \quad \text{and}\quad E|_ U \to i_ U(RQ_ U(E|_ U))

are isomorphisms by Lemma 36.7.3. The result follows. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.