Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 8.10.6. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Let p : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{C} be a stack. Endow \mathcal{X} with the topology inherited from \mathcal{C} and let q : \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{X} be a stack. Then \mathcal{Y} is a stack over \mathcal{C}. If p and q define stacks in groupoids, then \mathcal{Y} is a stack in groupoids over \mathcal{C}.

Proof. We check the three conditions in Definition 8.4.1 to prove that \mathcal{Y} is a stack over \mathcal{C}. By Categories, Lemma 4.33.12 we find that \mathcal{Y} is a fibred category over \mathcal{C}. Thus condition (1) holds.

Let U be an object of \mathcal{C} and let y_1, y_2 be objects of \mathcal{Y} over U. Denote x_ i = q(y_ i) in \mathcal{X}. Consider the map of presheaves

q : \mathit{Mor}_{\mathcal{Y}/\mathcal{C}}(y_1, y_2) \longrightarrow \mathit{Mor}_{\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{C}}(x_1, x_2)

on \mathcal{C}/U, see Lemma 8.2.3. Let \{ U_ i \to U\} be a covering and let \varphi _ i be a section of the presheaf on the left over U_ i such that \varphi _ i and \varphi _ j restrict to the same section over U_ i \times _ U U_ j. We have to find a morphism \varphi : y_1 \to y_2 restricting to \varphi _ i. Note that q(\varphi _ i) = \psi |_{U_ i} for some morphism \psi : x_1 \to x_2 over U because the second presheaf is a sheaf (by assumption). Let y_{12} \to y_2 be the strongly \mathcal{X}-cartesian morphism of \mathcal{Y} lying over \psi . Then \varphi _ i corresponds to a morphism \varphi '_ i : y_1|_{U_ i} \to y_{12}|_{U_ i} over x_1|_{U_ i}. In other words, \varphi '_ i now define local sections of the presheaf

\mathit{Mor}_{\mathcal{Y}/\mathcal{X}}(y_1, y_{12})

over the members of the covering \{ x_1|_{U_ i} \to x_1\} . By assumption these glue to a unique morphism y_1 \to y_{12} which composed with the given morphism y_{12} \to y_2 produces the desired morphism y_1 \to y_2.

Finally, we show that descent data are effective. Let \{ f_ i : U_ i \to U\} be a covering of \mathcal{C} and let (y_ i, \varphi _{ij}) be a descent datum relative to this covering (Definition 8.3.1). Setting x_ i = q(y_ i) and \psi _{ij} = q(\varphi _{ij}) we obtain a descent datum (x_ i, \psi _{ij}) for the covering in \mathcal{X}. By assumption on \mathcal{X} we may assume x_ i = x|_{U_ i} and the \psi _{ij} equal to the canonical descent datum (Definition 8.3.5). In this case \{ x|_{U_ i} \to x\} is a covering and we can view (y_ i, \varphi _{ij}) as a descent datum relative to this covering. By our assumption that \mathcal{Y} is a stack over \mathcal{C} we see that it is effective which finishes the proof of condition (3).

The final assertion follows because \mathcal{Y} is a stack over \mathcal{C} and is fibred in groupoids by Categories, Lemma 4.35.14. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #8729 by Erhard Neher on

Line 8 of the proof should read: We have to find a morphism restricting to ...


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.