Lemma 8.10.1. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ be a fibred category. Let $\text{Cov}(\mathcal{S})$ be the set of families $\{ x_ i \to x\} _{i \in I}$ of morphisms in $\mathcal{S}$ with fixed target such that (a) each $x_ i \to x$ is strongly cartesian, and (b) $\{ p(x_ i) \to p(x)\} _{i \in I}$ is a covering of $\mathcal{C}$. Then $(\mathcal{S}, \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S}))$ is a site.
8.10 Inherited topologies
It turns out that a fibred category over a site inherits a canonical topology from the underlying site.
Proof. We have to check the three conditions of Sites, Definition 7.6.2.
If $x \to y$ is an isomorphism of $\mathcal{S}$, then it is strongly cartesian by Categories, Lemma 4.33.2 and $p(x) \to p(y)$ is an isomorphism of $\mathcal{C}$. Thus $\{ p(x) \to p(y)\} $ is a covering of $\mathcal{C}$ whence $\{ x \to y\} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S})$.
If $\{ x_ i \to x\} _{i\in I} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S})$ and for each $i$ we have $\{ y_{ij} \to x_ i\} _{j\in J_ i} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S})$, then each composition $y_{ij} \to x$ is strongly cartesian by Categories, Lemma 4.33.2 and $\{ p(y_{ij}) \to p(x)\} _{i \in I, j\in J_ i} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{C})$. Hence also $\{ y_{ij} \to x\} _{i \in I, j\in J_ i} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S})$.
Suppose $\{ x_ i \to x\} _{i\in I}\in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S})$ and $y \to x$ is a morphism of $\mathcal{S}$. As $\{ p(x_ i) \to p(x)\} $ is a covering of $\mathcal{C}$ we see that $p(x_ i) \times _{p(x)} p(y)$ exists. Hence Categories, Lemma 4.33.13 implies that $x_ i \times _ x y$ exists, that $p(x_ i \times _ x y) = p(x_ i) \times _{p(x)} p(y)$, and that $x_ i \times _ x y \to y$ is strongly cartesian. Since also $\{ p(x_ i) \times _{p(x)} p(y) \to p(y) \} _{i\in I} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{C})$ we conclude that $\{ x_ i \times _ x y \to y \} _{i\in I} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S})$
This finishes the proof. $\square$
Note that if $p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ is fibred in groupoids, then the coverings of the site $\mathcal{S}$ in Lemma 8.10.1 are characterized by
because every morphism of $\mathcal{S}$ is strongly cartesian.
Definition 8.10.2. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ be a fibred category. We say $(\mathcal{S}, \text{Cov}(\mathcal{S}))$ as in Lemma 8.10.1 is the structure of site on $\mathcal{S}$ inherited from $\mathcal{C}$. We sometimes indicate this by saying that $\mathcal{S}$ is endowed with the topology inherited from $\mathcal{C}$.
In particular we obtain a topos of sheaves $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{S})$ in this situation. It turns out that this topos is functorial with respect to $1$-morphisms of fibred categories.
Lemma 8.10.3. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $F : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be a $1$-morphism of fibred categories over $\mathcal{C}$. Then $F$ is a continuous and cocontinuous functor between the structure of sites inherited from $\mathcal{C}$. Hence $F$ induces a morphism of topoi $f : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{Y})$ with $f_* = {}_ sF = {}_ pF$ and $f^{-1} = F^ s = F^ p$. In particular $f^{-1}(\mathcal{G})(x) = \mathcal{G}(F(x))$ for a sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $\mathcal{Y}$ and object $x$ of $\mathcal{X}$.
Proof. We first prove that $F$ is continuous. Let $\{ x_ i \to x\} _{i \in I}$ be a covering of $\mathcal{X}$. By Categories, Definition 4.33.9 the functor $F$ transforms strongly cartesian morphisms into strongly cartesian morphisms, hence $\{ F(x_ i) \to F(x)\} _{i \in I}$ is a covering of $\mathcal{Y}$. This proves part (1) of Sites, Definition 7.13.1. Moreover, let $x' \to x$ be a morphism of $\mathcal{X}$. By Categories, Lemma 4.33.13 the fibre product $x_ i \times _ x x'$ exists and $x_ i \times _ x x' \to x'$ is strongly cartesian. Hence $F(x_ i \times _ x x') \to F(x')$ is strongly cartesian. By Categories, Lemma 4.33.13 applied to $\mathcal{Y}$ this means that $F(x_ i \times _ x x') = F(x_ i) \times _{F(x)} F(x')$. This proves part (2) of Sites, Definition 7.13.1 and we conclude that $F$ is continuous.
Next we prove that $F$ is cocontinuous. Let $x \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X})$ and let $\{ y_ i \to F(x)\} _{i \in I}$ be a covering in $\mathcal{Y}$. Denote $\{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I}$ the corresponding covering of $\mathcal{C}$. For each $i$ choose a strongly cartesian morphism $x_ i \to x$ in $\mathcal{X}$ lying over $U_ i \to U$. Then $F(x_ i) \to F(x)$ and $y_ i \to F(x)$ are both a strongly cartesian morphisms in $\mathcal{Y}$ lying over $U_ i \to U$. Hence there exists a unique isomorphism $F(x_ i) \to y_ i$ in $\mathcal{Y}_{U_ i}$ compatible with the maps to $F(x)$. Thus $\{ x_ i \to x\} _{i \in I}$ is a covering of $\mathcal{X}$ such that $\{ F(x_ i) \to F(x)\} _{i \in I}$ is isomorphic to $\{ y_ i \to F(x)\} _{i \in I}$. Hence $F$ is cocontinuous, see Sites, Definition 7.20.1.
The final assertion follows from the first two, see Sites, Lemmas 7.21.1, 7.20.2, and 7.21.5. $\square$
Lemma 8.10.4. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $p : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{C}$ be a category fibred in groupoids. Let $x \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X})$ lying over $U = p(x)$. The functor $p$ induces an equivalence of sites $\mathcal{X}/x \to \mathcal{C}/U$ where $\mathcal{X}$ is endowed with the topology inherited from $\mathcal{C}$.
Proof. Here $\mathcal{C}/U$ is the localization of the site $\mathcal{C}$ at the object $U$ and similarly for $\mathcal{X}/x$. It follows from Categories, Definition 4.35.1 that the rule $x'/x \mapsto p(x')/p(x)$ defines an equivalence of categories $\mathcal{X}/x \to \mathcal{C}/U$. Whereupon it follows from Definition 8.10.2 that coverings of $x'$ in $\mathcal{X}/x$ are in bijective correspondence with coverings of $p(x')$ in $\mathcal{C}/U$. $\square$
Lemma 8.10.5. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $p : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{C}$ and $q : \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{C}$ be stacks in groupoids. Let $F : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be a $1$-morphism of categories over $\mathcal{C}$. If $F$ turns $\mathcal{X}$ into a category fibred in groupoids over $\mathcal{Y}$, then $\mathcal{X}$ is a stack in groupoids over $\mathcal{Y}$ (with topology inherited from $\mathcal{C}$).
Proof. Let us prove descent for objects. Let $\{ y_ i \to y\} $ be a covering of $\mathcal{Y}$. Let $(x_ i, \varphi _{ij})$ be a descent datum in $\mathcal{X}$ with respect to this covering. Then $(x_ i, \varphi _{ij})$ is also a descent datum with respect to the covering $\{ q(y_ i) \to q(y)\} $ of $\mathcal{C}$. As $\mathcal{X}$ is a stack in groupoids we obtain an object $x$ over $q(y)$ and isomorphisms $\psi _ i : x|_{q(y_ i)} \to x_ i$ over $q(y_ i)$ compatible with the $\varphi _{ij}$, i.e., such that
Consider the sheaf $\mathit{I} = \mathit{Isom}_\mathcal {Y}(F(x), y)$ on $\mathcal{C}/p(x)$. Note that $s_ i = F(\psi _ i) \in \mathit{I}(q(x_ i))$ because $F(x_ i) = y_ i$. Because $F(\varphi _{ij}) = \text{id}$ (as we started with a descent datum over $\{ y_ i \to y\} $) the displayed formula shows that $s_ i|_{q(y_ i) \times _{q(y)} q(y_ j)} = s_ j|_{q(y_ i) \times _{q(y)} q(y_ j)}$. Hence the local sections $s_ i$ glue to $s : F(x) \to y$. As $F$ is fibred in groupoids we see that $x$ is isomorphic to an object $x'$ with $F(x') = y$. We omit the verification that $x'$ in the fibre category of $\mathcal{X}$ over $y$ is a solution to the problem of descent posed by the descent datum $(x_ i, \varphi _{ij})$. We also omit the proof of the sheaf property of the $\mathit{Isom}$-presheaves of $\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{Y}$. $\square$
Lemma 8.10.6. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $p : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{C}$ be a stack. Endow $\mathcal{X}$ with the topology inherited from $\mathcal{C}$ and let $q : \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{X}$ be a stack. Then $\mathcal{Y}$ is a stack over $\mathcal{C}$. If $p$ and $q$ define stacks in groupoids, then $\mathcal{Y}$ is a stack in groupoids over $\mathcal{C}$.
Proof. We check the three conditions in Definition 8.4.1 to prove that $\mathcal{Y}$ is a stack over $\mathcal{C}$. By Categories, Lemma 4.33.12 we find that $\mathcal{Y}$ is a fibred category over $\mathcal{C}$. Thus condition (1) holds.
Let $U$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$ and let $y_1, y_2$ be objects of $\mathcal{Y}$ over $U$. Denote $x_ i = q(y_ i)$ in $\mathcal{X}$. Consider the map of presheaves
on $\mathcal{C}/U$, see Lemma 8.2.3. Let $\{ U_ i \to U\} $ be a covering and let $\varphi _ i$ be a section of the presheaf on the left over $U_ i$ such that $\varphi _ i$ and $\varphi _ j$ restrict to the same section over $U_ i \times _ U U_ j$. We have to find a morphism $\varphi : y_1 \to y_2$ restricting to $\varphi _ i$. Note that $q(\varphi _ i) = \psi |_{U_ i}$ for some morphism $\psi : x_1 \to x_2$ over $U$ because the second presheaf is a sheaf (by assumption). Let $y_{12} \to y_2$ be the strongly $\mathcal{X}$-cartesian morphism of $\mathcal{Y}$ lying over $\psi $. Then $\varphi _ i$ corresponds to a morphism $\varphi '_ i : y_1|_{U_ i} \to y_{12}|_{U_ i}$ over $x_1|_{U_ i}$. In other words, $\varphi '_ i$ now define local sections of the presheaf
over the members of the covering $\{ x_1|_{U_ i} \to x_1\} $. By assumption these glue to a unique morphism $y_1 \to y_{12}$ which composed with the given morphism $y_{12} \to y_2$ produces the desired morphism $y_1 \to y_2$.
Finally, we show that descent data are effective. Let $\{ f_ i : U_ i \to U\} $ be a covering of $\mathcal{C}$ and let $(y_ i, \varphi _{ij})$ be a descent datum relative to this covering (Definition 8.3.1). Setting $x_ i = q(y_ i)$ and $\psi _{ij} = q(\varphi _{ij})$ we obtain a descent datum $(x_ i, \psi _{ij})$ for the covering in $\mathcal{X}$. By assumption on $\mathcal{X}$ we may assume $x_ i = x|_{U_ i}$ and the $\psi _{ij}$ equal to the canonical descent datum (Definition 8.3.5). In this case $\{ x|_{U_ i} \to x\} $ is a covering and we can view $(y_ i, \varphi _{ij})$ as a descent datum relative to this covering. By our assumption that $\mathcal{Y}$ is a stack over $\mathcal{C}$ we see that it is effective which finishes the proof of condition (3).
The final assertion follows because $\mathcal{Y}$ is a stack over $\mathcal{C}$ and is fibred in groupoids by Categories, Lemma 4.35.14. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)