Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

7.24 Existence of lower shriek

In this section we discuss some cases of morphisms of topoi f for which f^{-1} has a left adjoint f_!.

Lemma 7.24.1. Let \mathcal{C}, \mathcal{D} be two sites. Let f : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) be a morphism of topoi. Let E \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) be a subset such that

  1. for V \in E there exists a sheaf \mathcal{G} on \mathcal{C} such that f^{-1}\mathcal{F}(V) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{F}) functorially for \mathcal{F} in \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}),

  2. every object of \mathcal{D} has a covering by objects of E.

Then f^{-1} has a left adjoint f_!.

Proof. By the Yoneda lemma (Categories, Lemma 4.3.5) the sheaf \mathcal{G}_ V corresponding to V \in E is defined up to unique isomorphism by the formula f^{-1}\mathcal{F}(V) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{G}_ V, \mathcal{F}). Recall that f^{-1}\mathcal{F}(V) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D})}(h_ V^\# , f^{-1}\mathcal{F}). Denote i_ V : h_ V^\# \to f^{-1}\mathcal{G}_ V the map corresponding to \text{id} in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (\mathcal{G}_ V, \mathcal{G}_ V). Functoriality in (1) implies that the bijection is given by

\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{G}_ V, \mathcal{F}) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D})}(h_ V^\# , f^{-1}\mathcal{F}),\quad \varphi \mapsto f^{-1}\varphi \circ i_ V

For any V_1, V_2 \in E there is a canonical map

\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D})}(h^\# _{V_2}, h^\# _{V_1}) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{G}_{V_2}, \mathcal{G}_{V_1}),\quad \varphi \mapsto f_!(\varphi )

which is characterized by f^{-1}(f_!(\varphi )) \circ i_{V_2} = i_{V_1} \circ \varphi . Note that \varphi \mapsto f_!(\varphi ) is compatible with composition; this can be seen directly from the characterization. Hence h_ V^\# \mapsto \mathcal{G}_ V and \varphi \mapsto f_!\varphi is a functor from the full subcategory of \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) whose objects are the h_ V^\# .

Let J be a set and let J \to E, j \mapsto V_ j be a map. Then we have a functorial bijection

\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})}(\coprod \mathcal{G}_{V_ j}, \mathcal{F}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D})}(\coprod h_{V_ j}^\# , f^{-1}\mathcal{F})

using the product of the bijections above. Hence we can extend the functor f_! to the full subcategory of \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) whose objects are coproducts of h_ V^\# with V \in E.

Given an arbitrary sheaf \mathcal{H} on \mathcal{D} we choose a coequalizer diagram

\xymatrix{ \mathcal{H}_1 \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & \mathcal{H}_0 \ar[r] & \mathcal{H} }

where \mathcal{H}_ i = \coprod h_{V_{i, j}}^\# is a coproduct with V_{i, j} \in E. This is possible by assumption (2), see Lemma 7.12.5 (for those worried about set theoretical issues, note that the construction given in Lemma 7.12.5 is canonical). Define f_!(\mathcal{H}) to be the sheaf on \mathcal{C} which makes

\xymatrix{ f_!\mathcal{H}_1 \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & f_!\mathcal{H}_0 \ar[r] & f_!\mathcal{H} }

a coequalizer diagram. Then

\begin{align*} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (f_!\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{F}) & = \text{Equalizer}( \xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (f_!\mathcal{H}_0, \mathcal{F}) \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (f_!\mathcal{H}_1, \mathcal{F}) } ) \\ & = \text{Equalizer}( \xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (\mathcal{H}_0, f^{-1}\mathcal{F}) \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits (\mathcal{H}_1, f^{-1}\mathcal{F}) } ) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (\mathcal{H}, f^{-1}\mathcal{F}) \end{align*}

Hence we see that we can extend f_! to the whole category of sheaves on \mathcal{D}. \square


Comments (3)

Comment #3071 by Dario Weißmann on

After the diagram used to define the sentence should be finished with 'exact' or 'an equalizer diagram'.

Comment #3073 by Dario Weißmann on

*coequalizer

Also, a few lines above 'an coequalizer' should be 'a coequalizer'


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.