Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 59.82.8. Let X be a scheme with affine diagonal which can be covered by n + 1 affine opens. Let Z \subset X be a closed subscheme. Let \mathcal{A} be a torsion sheaf of rings on X_{\acute{e}tale} and let \mathcal{I} be an injective sheaf of \mathcal{A}-modules on X_{\acute{e}tale}. Then H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \mathcal{I}|_ Z) = 0 for q > n.

Proof. We will prove this by induction on n. If n = 0, then X is affine. Say X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) and Z = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/I). Let A^ h be the filtered colimit of étale A-algebras B such that A/I \to B/IB is an isomorphism. Then (A^ h, IA^ h) is a henselian pair and A/I = A^ h/IA^ h, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.12.1 and its proof. Set X^ h = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A^ h). By Theorem 59.82.7 we see that

H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \mathcal{I}|_ Z) = H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(X^ h, \mathcal{I}|_{X^ h})

By Theorem 59.51.3 we have

H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(X^ h, \mathcal{I}|_{X^ h}) = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{A \to B} H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B), \mathcal{I}|_{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)})

where the colimit is over the A-algebras B as above. Since the morphisms \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) are étale, the restriction \mathcal{I}|_{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)} is an injective sheaf of \mathcal{A}|_{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)}-modules (Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.7.1). Thus the cohomology groups on the right are zero and we get the result in this case.

Induction step. We can use Mayer-Vietoris to do the induction step. Namely, suppose that X = U \cup V where U is a union of n affine opens and V is affine. Then, using that the diagonal of X is affine, we see that U \cap V is the union of n affine opens. Mayer-Vietoris gives an exact sequence

H^{q - 1}_{\acute{e}tale}(U \cap V \cap Z, \mathcal{I}|_ Z) \to H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \mathcal{I}|_ Z) \to H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(U \cap Z, \mathcal{I}|_ Z) \oplus H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(V \cap Z, \mathcal{I}|_ Z)

and by our induction hypothesis we obtain vanishing for q > n as desired. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 7 comment(s) on Section 59.82: Affine analog of proper base change

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.