Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.103.11. Suppose R is a Noetherian local ring. Let M be a Cohen-Macaulay module over R. For any prime \mathfrak p \subset R the module M_{\mathfrak p} is Cohen-Macaulay over R_\mathfrak p.

Proof. We may and do assume \mathfrak p \not= \mathfrak m and M not zero. Choose a maximal chain of primes \mathfrak p = \mathfrak p_ c \subset \mathfrak p_{c - 1} \subset \ldots \subset \mathfrak p_1 \subset \mathfrak m. If we prove the result for M_{\mathfrak p_1} over R_{\mathfrak p_1}, then the lemma will follow by induction on c. Thus we may assume that there is no prime strictly between \mathfrak p and \mathfrak m. Note that \dim (\text{Supp}(M_\mathfrak p)) \leq \dim (\text{Supp}(M)) - 1 because any chain of primes in the support of M_\mathfrak p can be extended by one more prime (namely \mathfrak m) in the support of M. On the other hand, we have \text{depth}(M_\mathfrak p) \geq \text{depth}(M) - \dim (R/\mathfrak p) = \text{depth}(M) - 1 by Lemma 10.72.10 and our choice of \mathfrak p. Thus \text{depth}(M_\mathfrak p) \geq \dim (\text{Supp}(M_\mathfrak p)) as desired (the other inequality is Lemma 10.72.3). \square


Comments (2)

Comment #6601 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on

The last inequality should be . The right bracket is omitted.

There are also:

  • 6 comment(s) on Section 10.103: Cohen-Macaulay modules

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.