Lemma 10.103.11. Suppose R is a Noetherian local ring. Let M be a Cohen-Macaulay module over R. For any prime \mathfrak p \subset R the module M_{\mathfrak p} is Cohen-Macaulay over R_\mathfrak p.
Proof. We may and do assume \mathfrak p \not= \mathfrak m and M not zero. Choose a maximal chain of primes \mathfrak p = \mathfrak p_ c \subset \mathfrak p_{c - 1} \subset \ldots \subset \mathfrak p_1 \subset \mathfrak m. If we prove the result for M_{\mathfrak p_1} over R_{\mathfrak p_1}, then the lemma will follow by induction on c. Thus we may assume that there is no prime strictly between \mathfrak p and \mathfrak m. Note that \dim (\text{Supp}(M_\mathfrak p)) \leq \dim (\text{Supp}(M)) - 1 because any chain of primes in the support of M_\mathfrak p can be extended by one more prime (namely \mathfrak m) in the support of M. On the other hand, we have \text{depth}(M_\mathfrak p) \geq \text{depth}(M) - \dim (R/\mathfrak p) = \text{depth}(M) - 1 by Lemma 10.72.10 and our choice of \mathfrak p. Thus \text{depth}(M_\mathfrak p) \geq \dim (\text{Supp}(M_\mathfrak p)) as desired (the other inequality is Lemma 10.72.3). \square
Comments (2)
Comment #6601 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on
Comment #6847 by Johan on
There are also: