The Stacks project

85.3 Conventions and notation

The conventions from now on will be similar to the conventions in Properties of Spaces, Section 64.2. Thus from now on the standing assumption is that all schemes are contained in a big fppf site $\mathit{Sch}_{fppf}$. And all rings $A$ considered have the property that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ is (isomorphic) to an object of this big site. For topological rings $A$ we assume only that all discrete quotients have this property (but usually we assume more, compare with Remark 85.7.6).

Let $S$ be a scheme and let $X$ be a “space” over $S$, i.e., a sheaf on $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. In this chapter we will write $X \times _ S X$ for the product of $X$ with itself in the category of sheaves on $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$ instead of $X \times X$. Moreover, if $X$ and $Y$ are “spaces” then we say "let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism" to indicate that $f$ is a natural transformation of functors, i.e., a map of sheaves on $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Similarly, if $U$ is a scheme over $S$ and $X$ is a “space” over $S$, then we say "let $f : U \to X$ be a morphism" or "let $g : X \to U$ be a morphism" to indicate that $f$ or $g$ is a map of sheaves $h_ U \to X$ or $X \to h_ U$ where $h_ U$ is as in Categories, Example 4.3.4.


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0AI5. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.