Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 87.10.5. Let S be a scheme. Let X be an affine formal algebraic space. The following are equivalent

  1. X is Noetherian,

  2. X is adic* and for every closed immersion T \to X with T a scheme, T is Noetherian,

  3. X is adic* and for some choice of X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_\lambda as in Definition 87.9.1 the schemes X_\lambda are Noetherian, and

  4. X is weakly adic and for some choice X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_\lambda as in Definition 87.9.1 the schemes X_\lambda are Noetherian.

Proof. Assume X is Noetherian. Then X = \text{Spf}(A) where A is a Noetherian adic ring. Let T \to X be a closed immersion where T is a scheme. By Lemma 87.9.6 we see that T is affine and that T \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is a closed immersion. Since A is Noetherian, we see that T is Noetherian. In this way we see that (1) \Rightarrow (2).

The implications (2) \Rightarrow (3) and (2) \Rightarrow (4) are immediate (see Lemma 87.10.3).

To prove (3) \Rightarrow (1) write X = \text{Spf}(A) for some adic ring A with finitely generated ideal of definition I. We are also given that the rings A/I_\lambda are Noetherian for some fundamental system of open ideals I_\lambda . Since I is open, we can find a \lambda such that I_\lambda \subset I. Then A/I is Noetherian and we conclude that A is Noetherian by Algebra, Lemma 10.97.5.

To prove (4) \Rightarrow (3) write X = \text{Spf}(A) for some weakly adic ring A. Then A is admissible and has an ideal of definition I and the closure I_2 of I^2 is open, see Lemma 87.7.2. We are also given that the rings A/I_\lambda are Noetherian for some fundamental system of open ideals I_\lambda . Choose a \lambda such that I_\lambda \subset I_2. Then A/I_2 is Noetherian as a quotient of A/I_\lambda . Hence I/I_2 is a finite A-module. Hence A is an adic ring with a finitely generated ideal of definition by Lemma 87.7.4. Thus X is adic* and (3) holds. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #1560 by Matthew Emerton on

I think statement (3) means "for any closed immersion" rather than "for some closed immersion", but I was a bit confused when I first read it, because of the slight ambiguity in the phrase "a closed immersion". If my interpretation is correct, I might suggest replacing "a" by "any", just for the sake of maximal clarity.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.