Lemma 87.33.1. Let S be a scheme. Let A be a weakly admissible topological S-algebra. Let X be an affine scheme over S. Then the natural map
is bijective.
We prove a few results that will be useful later. In the paper [Bhatt-Algebraize] the reader can find very general results of a similar nature.
Lemma 87.33.1. Let S be a scheme. Let A be a weakly admissible topological S-algebra. Let X be an affine scheme over S. Then the natural map
is bijective.
Proof. If X is affine, say X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B), then we see from Lemma 87.9.10 that morphisms \text{Spf}(A) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) correspond to continuous S-algebra maps B \to A where B has the discrete topology. These are just S-algebra maps, which correspond to morphisms \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B). \square
Lemma 87.33.2. Let S be a scheme. Let A be a weakly admissible topological S-algebra such that A/I is a local ring for some weak ideal of definition I \subset A. Let X be a scheme over S. Then the natural map
is bijective.
Proof. Let \varphi : \text{Spf}(A) \to X be a morphism. Since \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/I) is local we see that \varphi maps \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/I) into an affine open U \subset X. However, this then implies that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/J) maps into U for every ideal of definition J. Hence we may apply Lemma 87.33.1 to see that \varphi comes from a morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \to X. This proves surjectivity of the map. We omit the proof of injectivity. \square
Lemma 87.33.3. Let S be a scheme. Let R be a complete local Noetherian S-algebra. Let X be an algebraic space over S. Then the natural map
is bijective.
Proof. Let \mathfrak m be the maximal ideal of R. We have to show that
is bijective for R as above.
Injectivity: Let x, x' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \to X be two morphisms mapping to the same element in the right hand side. Consider the fibre product
Then T is a scheme and T \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) is locally of finite type, monomorphism, separated, and locally quasi-finite, see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.4.1. In particular T is locally Noetherian, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.15.6. Let t \in T be the unique point mapping to the closed point of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) which exists as x and x' agree over R/\mathfrak m. Then R \to \mathcal{O}_{T, t} is a local ring map of Noetherian rings such that R/\mathfrak m^ n \to \mathcal{O}_{T, t}/\mathfrak m^ n\mathcal{O}_{T, t} is an isomorphism for all n (because x and x' agree over \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/\mathfrak m^ n) for all n). Since \mathcal{O}_{T, t} maps injectively into its completion (see Algebra, Lemma 10.51.4) we conclude that R = \mathcal{O}_{T, t}. Hence x and x' agree over R.
Surjectivity: Let (x_ n) be an element of the right hand side. Choose a scheme U and a surjective étale morphism U \to X. Denote x_0 : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X the morphism induced on the residue field k = R/\mathfrak m. The morphism of schemes U \times _{X, x_0} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is surjective étale. Thus U \times _{X, x_0} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is a nonempty disjoint union of spectra of finite separable field extensions of k, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.7. Hence we can find a finite separable field extension k'/k and a k'-point u_0 : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k') \to U such that
commutes. Let R \subset R' be the finite étale extension of Noetherian complete local rings which induces k'/k on residue fields (see Algebra, Lemmas 10.153.7 and 10.153.9). Denote x'_ n the restriction of x_ n to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R'/\mathfrak m^ nR'). By More on Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 76.16.8 we can find an element (u'_ n) \in \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ S(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R'/\mathfrak m^ nR'), U) mapping to (x'_ n). By Lemma 87.33.2 the family (u'_ n) comes from a unique morphism u' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R') \to U. Denote x' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R') \to X the composition. Note that R' \otimes _ R R' is a finite product of spectra of Noetherian complete local rings to which our current discussion applies. Hence the diagram
is commutative by the injectivity shown above and the fact that x'_ n is the restriction of x_ n which is defined over R/\mathfrak m^ n. Since \{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)\} is an fppf covering we conclude that x' descends to a morphism x : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \to X. We omit the proof that x_ n is the restriction of x to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/\mathfrak m^ n). \square
Lemma 87.33.4. Let S be a scheme. Let X be an algebraic space over S. Let T \subset |X| be a closed subset such that X \setminus T \to X is quasi-compact. Let R be a complete local Noetherian S-algebra. Then an adic morphism p : \text{Spf}(R) \to X_{/T} corresponds to a unique morphism g : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \to X such that g^{-1}(T) = \{ \mathfrak m_ R\} .
Proof. The statement makes sense because X_{/T} is adic* by Lemma 87.20.8 (and hence we're allowed to use the terminology adic for morphisms, see Definition 87.23.2). Let p be given. By Lemma 87.33.3 we get a unique morphism g : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \to X corresponding to the composition \text{Spf}(R) \to X_{/T} \to X. Let Z \subset X be the reduced induced closed subspace structure on T. The incusion morphism Z \to X corresponds to a morphism Z \to X_{/T}. Since p is adic it is representable by algebraic spaces and we find
is an algebraic space endowed with a closed immersion to \text{Spf}(R). (Equality holds because X_{/T} \to X is a monomorphism.) Thus this fibre product is equal to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/J) for some ideal J \subset R which contains \mathfrak m_ R^{n_0} for some n_0 \geq 1. This implies that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \times _ X Z is a closed subscheme of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R), say \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \times _ X Z = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/I), whose intersection with \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/\mathfrak m_ R^ n) for n \geq n_0 is equal to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/J). In algebraic terms this says I + \mathfrak m_ R^ n = J + \mathfrak m_ R^ n = J for all n \geq n_0. By Krull's intersection theorem this implies I = J and we conclude. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #1058 by Matthieu Romagny on
Comment #1059 by Johan on