The Stacks project

Lemma 33.43.5. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a proper curve over $k$ with generic point $\xi $. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a locally free $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module of rank $n$ and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Then

\[ \chi (X, \mathcal{E} \otimes \mathcal{F}) = r \deg (\mathcal{E}) + n \chi (X, \mathcal{F}) \]

where $r = \dim _{\kappa (\xi )} \mathcal{F}_\xi $ is the rank of $\mathcal{F}$.

Proof. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be the property of coherent sheaves $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ expressing that the formula of the lemma holds. We claim that the assumptions (1) and (2) of Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.12.6 hold for $\mathcal{P}$. Namely, (1) holds because the Euler characteristic and the rank $r$ are additive in short exact sequences of coherent sheaves. And (2) holds too: If $Z = X$ then we may take $\mathcal{G} = \mathcal{O}_ X$ and $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ is true by the definition of degree. If $i : Z \to X$ is the inclusion of a closed point we may take $\mathcal{G} = i_*\mathcal{O}_ Z$ and $\mathcal{P}$ holds by Lemma 33.32.3 and the fact that $r = 0$ in this case. $\square$


Comments (3)

Comment #4619 by on

Since is a curve and is the generic point, we have and we have .

Comment #4622 by Raffaele Carbone on

Are you assuming any reducedness?

Comment #4625 by on

You can search the Stacks project for the key words "curve definition" (don't use the quotes) and then you will find Definition 33.42.1. You may have to do this several times. For example the definition of a curve refers to a variety which is defined in Definition 33.3.1. The definition of a variety refers to the notion of an integral scheme which is defined in Definition 28.3.1. This in turn relies on knowing what an integral domain is, see Definition 9.2.2. Since a nilpotent element of a ring is a zerodivisor, you conclude that integral schemes are reduced. Also, if you search for "integral reduced scheme" (don't use the quotes), then you will find Lemma 28.3.4. So, yes! I also hope this will help you and others answer similar questions.

PS: Most algebraic geometers would define a curve either as is done in the Stacks project or as what in the Stacks project would be called a geometrically integral curve.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 33.43: Degrees on curves

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0AYV. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.