The Stacks project

44.4 The Picard functor

Given any scheme $X$ we denote $\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X)$ the set of isomorphism classes of invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. See Modules, Definition 17.24.9. Given a morphism $f : X \to Y$ of schemes, pullback defines a group homomorphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (Y) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X)$. The assignment $X \leadsto \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X)$ is a contravariant functor from the category of schemes to the category of abelian groups. This functor is not representable, but it turns out that a relative variant of this construction sometimes is representable.

Let us define the Picard functor for a morphism of schemes $f : X \to S$. The idea behind our construction is that we'll take it to be the sheaf $R^1f_*\mathbf{G}_ m$ where we use the fppf topology to compute the higher direct image. Unwinding the definitions this leads to the following more direct definition.

Definition 44.4.1. Let $\mathit{Sch}_{fppf}$ be a big site as in Topologies, Definition 34.7.8. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of this site. The Picard functor $\mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}$ is the fppf sheafification of the functor

\[ (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} \longrightarrow \textit{Sets},\quad T \longmapsto \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X_ T) \]

If this functor is representable, then we denote $\underline{\mathrm{Pic}}_{X/S}$ a scheme representing it.

An often used remark is that if $T \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$, then $\mathrm{Pic}_{X_ T/T}$ is the restriction of $\mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}$ to $(\mathit{Sch}/T)_{fppf}$. It turns out to be nontrivial to see what the value of $\mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}$ is on schemes $T$ over $S$. Here is a lemma that helps with this task.

Lemma 44.4.2. Let $f : X \to S$ be as in Definition 44.4.1. If $\mathcal{O}_ T \to f_{T, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ T}$ is an isomorphism for all $T \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$, then

\[ 0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (T) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X_ T) \to \mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}(T) \]

is an exact sequence for all $T$.

Proof. We may replace $S$ by $T$ and $X$ by $X_ T$ and assume that $S = T$ to simplify the notation. Let $\mathcal{N}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module. If $f^*\mathcal{N} \cong \mathcal{O}_ X$, then we see that $f_*f^*\mathcal{N} \cong f_*\mathcal{O}_ X \cong \mathcal{O}_ S$ by assumption. Since $\mathcal{N}$ is locally trivial, we see that the canonical map $\mathcal{N} \to f_*f^*\mathcal{N}$ is locally an isomorphism (because $\mathcal{O}_ S \to f_*f^*\mathcal{O}_ S$ is an isomorphism by assumption). Hence we conclude that $\mathcal{N} \to f_*f^*\mathcal{N} \to \mathcal{O}_ S$ is an isomorphism and we see that $\mathcal{N}$ is trivial. This proves the first arrow is injective.

Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module which is in the kernel of $\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X) \to \mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}(S)$. Then there exists an fppf covering $\{ S_ i \to S\} $ such that $\mathcal{L}$ pulls back to the trivial invertible sheaf on $X_{S_ i}$. Choose a trivializing section $s_ i$. Then $\text{pr}_0^*s_ i$ and $\text{pr}_1^*s_ j$ are both trivialising sections of $\mathcal{L}$ over $X_{S_ i \times _ S S_ j}$ and hence differ by a multiplicative unit

\[ f_{ij} \in \Gamma (X_{S_ i \times _ S S_ j}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{S_ i \times _ S S_ j}}^*) = \Gamma (S_ i \times _ S S_ j, \mathcal{O}_{S_ i \times _ S S_ j}^*) \]

(equality by our assumption on pushforward of structure sheaves). Of course these elements satisfy the cocycle condition on $S_ i \times _ S S_ j \times _ S S_ k$, hence they define a descent datum on invertible sheaves for the fppf covering $\{ S_ i \to S\} $. By Descent, Proposition 35.5.2 there is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module $\mathcal{N}$ with trivializations over $S_ i$ whose associated descent datum is $\{ f_{ij}\} $. Then $f^*\mathcal{N} \cong \mathcal{L}$ as the functor from descent data to modules is fully faithful (see proposition cited above). $\square$

Lemma 44.4.3. Let $f : X \to S$ be as in Definition 44.4.1. Assume $f$ has a section $\sigma $ and that $\mathcal{O}_ T \to f_{T, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ T}$ is an isomorphism for all $T \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$. Then

\[ 0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (T) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X_ T) \to \mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}(T) \to 0 \]

is a split exact sequence with splitting given by $\sigma _ T^* : \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X_ T) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (T)$.

Proof. Denote $K(T) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\sigma _ T^* : \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X_ T) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (T))$. Since $\sigma $ is a section of $f$ we see that $\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X_ T)$ is the direct sum of $\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (T)$ and $K(T)$. Thus by Lemma 44.4.2 we see that $K(T) \subset \mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}(T)$ for all $T$. Moreover, it is clear from the construction that $\mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}$ is the sheafification of the presheaf $K$. To finish the proof it suffices to show that $K$ satisfies the sheaf condition for fppf coverings which we do in the next paragraph.

Let $\{ T_ i \to T\} $ be an fppf covering. Let $\mathcal{L}_ i$ be elements of $K(T_ i)$ which map to the same elements of $K(T_ i \times _ T T_ j)$ for all $i$ and $j$. Choose an isomorphism $\alpha _ i : \mathcal{O}_{T_ i} \to \sigma _{T_ i}^*\mathcal{L}_ i$ for all $i$. Choose an isomorphism

\[ \varphi _{ij} : \mathcal{L}_ i|_{X_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j}} \longrightarrow \mathcal{L}_ j|_{X_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j}} \]

If the map

\[ \alpha _ j|_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j} \circ \sigma _{T_ i \times _ T T_ j}^*\varphi _{ij} \circ \alpha _ i|_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j} : \mathcal{O}_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j} \to \mathcal{O}_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j} \]

is not equal to multiplication by $1$ but some $u_{ij}$, then we can scale $\varphi _{ij}$ by $u_{ij}^{-1}$ to correct this. Having done this, consider the self map

\[ \varphi _{ki}|_{X_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j \times _ T T_ k}} \circ \varphi _{jk}|_{X_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j \times _ T T_ k}} \circ \varphi _{ij}|_{X_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j \times _ T T_ k}} \quad \text{on}\quad \mathcal{L}_ i|_{X_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j \times _ T T_ k}} \]

which is given by multiplication by some regular function $f_{ijk}$ on the scheme $X_{T_ i \times _ T T_ j \times _ T T_ k}$. By our choice of $\varphi _{ij}$ we see that the pullback of this map by $\sigma $ is equal to multiplication by $1$. By our assumption on functions on $X$, we see that $f_{ijk} = 1$. Thus we obtain a descent datum for the fppf covering $\{ X_{T_ i} \to X\} $. By Descent, Proposition 35.5.2 there is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_{X_ T}$-module $\mathcal{L}$ and an isomorphism $\alpha : \mathcal{O}_ T \to \sigma _ T^*\mathcal{L}$ whose pullback to $X_{T_ i}$ recovers $(\mathcal{L}_ i, \alpha _ i)$ (small detail omitted). Thus $\mathcal{L}$ defines an object of $K(T)$ as desired. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0B9K. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.