Lemma 44.4.2. Let f : X \to S be as in Definition 44.4.1. If \mathcal{O}_ T \to f_{T, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ T} is an isomorphism for all T \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}), then
is an exact sequence for all T.
Lemma 44.4.2. Let f : X \to S be as in Definition 44.4.1. If \mathcal{O}_ T \to f_{T, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_ T} is an isomorphism for all T \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}), then
is an exact sequence for all T.
Proof. We may replace S by T and X by X_ T and assume that S = T to simplify the notation. Let \mathcal{N} be an invertible \mathcal{O}_ S-module. If f^*\mathcal{N} \cong \mathcal{O}_ X, then we see that f_*f^*\mathcal{N} \cong f_*\mathcal{O}_ X \cong \mathcal{O}_ S by assumption. Since \mathcal{N} is locally trivial, we see that the canonical map \mathcal{N} \to f_*f^*\mathcal{N} is locally an isomorphism (because \mathcal{O}_ S \to f_*f^*\mathcal{O}_ S is an isomorphism by assumption). Hence we conclude that \mathcal{N} \to f_*f^*\mathcal{N} \to \mathcal{O}_ S is an isomorphism and we see that \mathcal{N} is trivial. This proves the first arrow is injective.
Let \mathcal{L} be an invertible \mathcal{O}_ X-module which is in the kernel of \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X) \to \mathrm{Pic}_{X/S}(S). Then there exists an fppf covering \{ S_ i \to S\} such that \mathcal{L} pulls back to the trivial invertible sheaf on X_{S_ i}. Choose a trivializing section s_ i. Then \text{pr}_0^*s_ i and \text{pr}_1^*s_ j are both trivialising sections of \mathcal{L} over X_{S_ i \times _ S S_ j} and hence differ by a multiplicative unit
(equality by our assumption on pushforward of structure sheaves). Of course these elements satisfy the cocycle condition on S_ i \times _ S S_ j \times _ S S_ k, hence they define a descent datum on invertible sheaves for the fppf covering \{ S_ i \to S\} . By Descent, Proposition 35.5.2 there is an invertible \mathcal{O}_ S-module \mathcal{N} with trivializations over S_ i whose associated descent datum is \{ f_{ij}\} . Then f^*\mathcal{N} \cong \mathcal{L} as the functor from descent data to modules is fully faithful (see proposition cited above). \square
Comments (0)