The Stacks project

Lemma 9.20.7. Let $L/K$ be a finite extension of fields. The following are equivalent:

  1. $L/K$ is separable,

  2. $\text{Trace}_{L/K}$ is not identically zero, and

  3. the trace pairing $Q_{L/K}$ is nondegenerate.

Proof. It is clear that (3) implies (2). If (2) holds, then pick $\gamma \in L$ with $\text{Trace}_{L/K}(\gamma ) \not= 0$. Then if $\alpha \in L$ is nonzero, we see that $Q_{L/K}(\alpha , \gamma /\alpha ) \not= 0$. Hence $Q_{L/K}$ is nondegenerate. This proves the equivalence of (2) and (3).

Suppose that $K$ has characteristic $p$ and $L = K(\alpha )$ with $\alpha \not\in K$ and $\alpha ^ p \in K$. Then $\text{Trace}_{L/K}(1) = p = 0$. For $i = 1, \ldots , p - 1$ we see that $x^ p - \alpha ^{pi}$ is the minimal polynomial for $\alpha ^ i$ over $K$ and we find $\text{Trace}_{L/K}(\alpha ^ i) = 0$ by Lemma 9.20.3. Hence for this kind of purely inseparable degree $p$ extension we see that $\text{Trace}_{L/K}$ is identically zero.

Assume that $L/K$ is not separable. Then there exists a subfield $L/K'/K$ such that $L/K'$ is a purely inseparable degree $p$ extension as in the previous paragraph, see Lemmas 9.14.6 and 9.14.5. Hence by Lemma 9.20.5 we see that $\text{Trace}_{L/K}$ is identically zero.

Assume on the other hand that $L/K$ is separable. By induction on the degree we will show that $\text{Trace}_{L/K}$ is not identically zero. Thus by Lemma 9.20.5 we may assume that $L/K$ is generated by a single element $\alpha $ (use that if the trace is nonzero then it is surjective). We have to show that $\text{Trace}_{L/K}(\alpha ^ e)$ is nonzero for some $e \geq 0$. Let $P = x^ d + a_1 x^{d - 1} + \ldots + a_ d$ be the minimal polynomial of $\alpha $ over $K$. Then $P$ is also the characteristic polynomial of the linear maps $\alpha : L \to L$, see Lemma 9.20.2. Since $L/k$ is separable we see from Lemma 9.12.4 that $P$ has $d$ pairwise distinct roots $\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ d$ in an algebraic closure $\overline{K}$ of $K$. Thus these are the eigenvalues of $\alpha : L \to L$. By linear algebra, the trace of $\alpha ^ e$ is equal to $\alpha _1^ e + \ldots + \alpha _ d^ e$. Thus we conclude by Lemma 9.13.2. $\square$

Comments (4)

Comment #1772 by Carl on

The first sentence of the proof is missing a "not" somewhere.

In the last paragraph, "If \alpha\notin K, then K' is not maximal" should be \alpha\notin K'.

Comment #3226 by Fan on

The last paragraph actually proves the same thing as the the previous ones: (2) implies (1), so (1) implies (2) is still missing. Maybe the standard proof using and linear independence of characters will do.

Comment #3329 by on

Oops! Good catch. This is fixed here in a slightly different manner than you suggest.

Comment #3377 by on

Actually, rather you should look here since my previous attempt was erroneous.

There are also:

  • 1 comment(s) on Section 9.20: Trace and norm

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0BIL. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.