Proof.
Proof of (1). Consider pairs (M, \sigma ) where K \subset M \subset L is a subfield such that M/K is Galois, \sigma \in \text{Gal}(M/K) with \sigma (\mathfrak q \cap M) = \mathfrak q' \cap M. We say (M', \sigma ') \geq (M, \sigma ) if and only if M \subset M' and \sigma '|_ M = \sigma . Observe that (K, \text{id}_ K) is such a pair as A = K \cap B since A is a normal domain. The collection of these pairs satisfies the hypotheses of Zorn's lemma, hence there exists a maximal pair (M, \sigma ). If M \not= L, then we can find M \subset M' \subset L with M'/M nontrivial and finite and M'/K Galois (Fields, Lemma 9.16.5). Choose \sigma ' \in \text{Gal}(M'/K) whose restriction to M is \sigma (Fields, Lemma 9.22.2). Then the primes \sigma '(\mathfrak q \cap M') and \mathfrak q' \cap M' restrict to the same prime of B \cap M. Since B \cap M = (B \cap M')^{\text{Gal}(M'/M)} we can use Lemma 15.110.8 to find \tau \in \text{Gal}(M'/M) with \tau (\sigma '(\mathfrak q \cap M')) = \mathfrak q' \cap M'. Hence (M', \tau \circ \sigma ') > (M, \sigma ) contradicting the maximality of (M, \sigma ).
Part (2) is proved in exactly the same manner as part (1). We write out the details. Pick \overline{\sigma } \in \text{Aut}(\kappa (\mathfrak q)/\kappa (\mathfrak p)). Consider pairs (M, \sigma ) where K \subset M \subset L is a subfield such that M/K is Galois, \sigma \in \text{Gal}(M/K) with \sigma (\mathfrak q \cap M) = \mathfrak q \cap M and
\xymatrix{ \kappa (\mathfrak q \cap M) \ar[r] \ar[d]_\sigma & \kappa (\mathfrak q) \ar[d]_{\overline{\sigma }} \\ \kappa (\mathfrak q \cap M) \ar[r] & \kappa (\mathfrak q) }
commutes. We say (M', \sigma ') \geq (M, \sigma ) if and only if M \subset M' and \sigma '|_ M = \sigma . As above (K, \text{id}_ K) is such a pair. The collection of these pairs satisfies the hypotheses of Zorn's lemma, hence there exists a maximal pair (M, \sigma ). If M \not= L, then we can find M \subset M' \subset L with M'/M finite and M'/K Galois (Fields, Lemma 9.16.5). Choose \sigma ' \in \text{Gal}(M'/K) whose restriction to M is \sigma (Fields, Lemma 9.22.2). Then the primes \sigma '(\mathfrak q \cap M') and \mathfrak q \cap M' restrict to the same prime of B \cap M. Adjusting the choice of \sigma ' as in the first paragraph, we may assume that \sigma '(\mathfrak q \cap M') = \mathfrak q \cap M'. Then \sigma ' and \overline{\sigma } define maps \kappa (\mathfrak q \cap M') \to \kappa (\mathfrak q) which agree on \kappa (\mathfrak q \cap M). Since B \cap M = (B \cap M')^{\text{Gal}(M'/M)} we can use Lemma 15.110.9 to find \tau \in \text{Gal}(M'/M) with \tau (\mathfrak q \cap M') = \mathfrak q \cap M' such that \tau \circ \sigma and \overline{\sigma } induce the same map on \kappa (\mathfrak q \cap M'). There is a small detail here in that the lemma first guarantees that \kappa (\mathfrak q \cap M')/\kappa (\mathfrak q \cap M) is normal, which then tells us that the difference between the maps is an automorphism of this extension (Fields, Lemma 9.15.10), to which we can apply the lemma to get \tau . Hence (M', \tau \circ \sigma ') > (M, \sigma ) contradicting the maximality of (M, \sigma ).
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: