Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 15.66.4. Let R be a ring. Let a \in \mathbf{Z} and let K be an object of D(R). The following are equivalent

  1. K has tor-amplitude in [a, \infty ], and

  2. K is quasi-isomorphic to a K-flat complex E^\bullet whose terms are flat R-modules with E^ i = 0 for i \not\in [a, \infty ].

Proof. The implication (2) \Rightarrow (1) is immediate. Assume (1) holds. First we choose a K-flat complex K^\bullet with flat terms representing K, see Lemma 15.59.10. For any R-module M the cohomology of

K^{n - 1} \otimes _ R M \to K^ n \otimes _ R M \to K^{n + 1} \otimes _ R M

computes H^ n(K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} M). This is always zero for n < a. Hence if we apply Lemma 15.66.2 to the complex \ldots \to K^{a - 1} \to K^ a \to K^{a + 1} we conclude that N = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(K^{a - 1} \to K^ a) is a flat R-module. We set

E^\bullet = \tau _{\geq a}K^\bullet = (\ldots \to 0 \to N \to K^{a + 1} \to \ldots )

The kernel L^\bullet of K^\bullet \to E^\bullet is the complex

L^\bullet = (\ldots \to K^{a - 1} \to I \to 0 \to \ldots )

where I \subset K^ a is the image of K^{a - 1} \to K^ a. Since we have the short exact sequence 0 \to I \to K^ a \to N \to 0 we see that I is a flat R-module. Thus L^\bullet is a bounded above complex of flat modules, hence K-flat by Lemma 15.59.7. It follows that E^\bullet is K-flat by Lemma 15.59.6. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 15.66: Tor dimension

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.