The Stacks project

Lemma 39.9.10. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$. Let $A$ be an abelian variety over $k$. The fibre of $[p] : A \to A$ over $0$ has at most $p^ g$ distinct points.

Proof. To prove this, we may and do replace $k$ by the algebraic closure. By Lemma 39.6.4 the derivative of $[p]$ is multiplication by $p$ as a map $T_{A/k, e} \to T_{A/k, e}$ and hence is zero (compare with proof of Lemma 39.9.9). Since $[p]$ commutes with translation we conclude that the derivative of $[p]$ is everywhere zero, i.e., that the induced map $[p]^*\Omega _{A/k} \to \Omega _{A/k}$ is zero. Looking at generic points, we find that the corresponding map $[p]^* : k(A) \to k(A)$ of function fields induces the zero map on $\Omega _{k(A)/k}$. Let $t_1, \ldots , t_ g$ be a p-basis of $k(A)$ over $k$ (More on Algebra, Definition 15.46.1 and Lemma 15.46.2). Then $[p]^*(t_ i)$ has a $p$th root by Algebra, Lemma 10.158.2. We conclude that $k(A)[x_1, \ldots , x_ g]/(x_1^ p - t_1, \ldots , x_ g^ p - t_ g)$ is a subextension of $[p]^* : k(A) \to k(A)$. Thus we can find an affine open $U \subset A$ such that $t_ i \in \mathcal{O}_ A(U)$ and $x_ i \in \mathcal{O}_ A([p]^{-1}(U))$. We obtain a factorization

\[ [p]^{-1}(U) \xrightarrow {\pi _1} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}(U)[x_1, \ldots , x_ g]/(x_1^ p - t_1, \ldots , x_ g^ p - t_ g)) \xrightarrow {\pi _2} U \]

of $[p]$ over $U$. After shrinking $U$ we may assume that $\pi _1$ is finite locally free (for example by generic flatness – actually it is already finite locally free in our case). By Lemma 39.9.8 we see that $[p]$ has degree $p^{2g}$. Since $\pi _2$ has degree $p^ g$ we see that $\pi _1$ has degree $p^ g$ as well. The morphism $\pi _2$ is a universal homeomorphism hence the fibres are singletons. We conclude that the (set theoretic) fibres of $[p]^{-1}(U) \to U$ are the fibres of $\pi _1$. Hence they have at most $p^ g$ elements. Since $[p]$ is a homomorphism of group schemes over $k$, the fibre of $[p] : A(k) \to A(k)$ has the same cardinality for every $a \in A(k)$ and the proof is complete. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #7865 by James on

Here it could be noted that .


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0C0Y. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.