The Stacks project

Lemma 29.4.5. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $Z, Y \subset X$ be closed subschemes. Let $Z \cap Y$ be the scheme theoretic intersection of $Z$ and $Y$. Then $Z \cap Y \to Z$ and $Z \cap Y \to Y$ are closed immersions and

\[ \xymatrix{ Z \cap Y \ar[r] \ar[d] & Z \ar[d] \\ Y \ar[r] & X } \]

is a cartesian diagram of schemes, i.e., $Z \cap Y = Z \times _ X Y$.

Proof. The morphisms $Z \cap Y \to Z$ and $Z \cap Y \to Y$ are closed immersions by Lemma 29.2.2. Let $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be an affine open of $X$ and let $Z \cap U$ and $Y \cap U$ correspond to the ideals $I \subset A$ and $J \subset A$. Then $Z \cap Y \cap U$ corresponds to $I + J \subset A$. Since $A/I \otimes _ A A/J = A/(I + J)$ we see that the diagram is cartesian by our description of fibre products of schemes in Schemes, Section 26.17. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0C4I. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.