Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/HTML.js

The Stacks project

Lemma 32.22.4. In Situation 32.22.1. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes quasi-separated and of finite type over S. Let

\vcenter { \xymatrix{ X \ar[r] \ar[d] & W \ar[d] \\ S \ar[r] & S_{i_1} } } \quad \text{and}\quad \vcenter { \xymatrix{ Y \ar[r] \ar[d] & V \ar[d] \\ S \ar[r] & S_{i_2} } }

be diagrams as in (32.22.2.1). Let X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq i_1} X_ i and Y = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq i_2} Y_ i be the corresponding limit descriptions as in Lemma 32.22.3. Then there exists an i_0 \geq \max (i_1, i_2) and a morphism

(f_ i)_{i \geq i_0} : (X_ i)_{i \geq i_0} \to (Y_ i)_{i \geq i_0}

of inverse systems over (S_ i)_{i \geq i_0} such that such that f = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq i_0} f_ i. If (g_ i)_{i \geq i_0} : (X_ i)_{i \geq i_0} \to (Y_ i)_{i \geq i_0} is a second morphism of inverse systems over (S_ i)_{i \geq i_0} such that such that f = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq i_0} g_ i then f_ i = g_ i for all i \gg i_0.

Proof. Since V \to S_{i_2} is of finite presentation and X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq i_1} X_ i we can appeal to Proposition 32.6.1 to find an i_0 \geq \max (i_1, i_2) and a morphism h : X_{i_0} \to V over S_{i_2} such that X \to X_{i_0} \to V is equal to X \to Y \to V. For i \geq i_0 we get a commutative solid diagram

\xymatrix{ X \ar[d] \ar[r] & X_ i \ar[r] \ar@{..>}[d] \ar@/_2pc/[dd] |!{[d];[ld]}\hole & X_{i_0} \ar[d]^ h \\ Y \ar[r] \ar[d] & Y_ i \ar[r] \ar[d] & V \ar[d] \\ S \ar[r] & S_ i \ar[r] & S_{i_0} }

Since X \to X_ i has scheme theoretically dense image and since Y_ i is the scheme theoretic image of Y \to S_ i \times _{S_{i_2}} V we find that the morphism X_ i \to S_ i \times _{S_{i_2}} V induced by the diagram factors through Y_ i (Morphisms, Lemma 29.6.6). This proves existence.

Uniqueness. Let E_ i \subset X_ i be the equalizer of f_ i and g_ i for i \geq i_0. By Schemes, Lemma 26.21.5 E_ i is a locally closed subscheme of X_ i. Since X_ i is a closed subscheme of S_ i \times _{S_{i_0}} X_{i_0} and similarly for Y_ i we see that

E_ i = X_ i \times _{(S_ i \times _{S_{i_0}} X_{i_0})} (S_ i \times _{S_{i_0}} E_{i_0})

Thus to finish the proof it suffices to show that X_ i \to X_{i_0} factors through E_{i_0} for some i \geq i_0. To do this we will use that X \to X_{i_0} factors through E_{i_0} as both f_{i_0} and g_{i_0} are compatible with f. Since X_ i is Noetherian, we see that the underlying topological space |E_{i_0}| is a constructible subset of |X_{i_0}| (Topology, Lemma 5.16.1). Hence X_ i \to X_{i_0} factors through E_{i_0} set theoretically for large enough i by Lemma 32.4.10. For such an i the scheme theoretic inverse image (X_ i \to X_{i_0})^{-1}(E_{i_0}) is a closed subscheme of X_ i through which X factors and hence equal to X_ i since X \to X_ i has scheme theoretically dense image by construction. This concludes the proof. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.