Lemma 77.3.6. In Situation 77.2.1.
If the support of $\mathcal{F}$ is proper over $Y$, then $\mathcal{F}$ is universally pure relative to $Y$.
If $f$ is proper, then $\mathcal{F}$ is universally pure relative to $Y$.
If $f$ is proper, then $X$ is universally pure relative to $Y$.
Proof. First we reduce (1) to (2). Namely, let $Z \subset X$ be the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}$ (Morphisms of Spaces, Definition 67.15.4). Let $i : Z \to X$ be the corresponding closed immersion and write $\mathcal{F} = i_*\mathcal{G}$ for some finite type quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ Z$-module $\mathcal{G}$. In case (1) $Z \to Y$ is proper by assumption. Thus by Lemma 77.3.5 case (1) reduces to case (2).
Assume $f$ is proper. Let $(g : T \to Y, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ be an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $y$. Since $f$ is proper, it is universally closed. Hence $f_ T : X_ T \to T$ is closed. Since $f_ T(\xi ) = t'$ this implies that $t \in f(\overline{\{ \xi \} })$ which is a contradiction. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)