Theorem 77.9.1. In Situation 77.7.1 assume
$f$ is of finite presentation,
$\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation, flat over $B$, and pure relative to $B$, and
$u$ is surjective.
77.9 Flattening a map
This section is the analogue of More on Flatness, Section 38.23. In particular the following result is a variant of More on Flatness, Theorem 38.23.3.
Then $F_{iso}$ is representable by a closed immersion $Z \to B$. Moreover $Z \to S$ is of finite presentation if $\mathcal{G}$ is of finite presentation.
Proof. Let $\mathcal{K} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(u)$ and denote $v : \mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{F}$ the inclusion. By Lemma 77.7.5 we see that $F_{u, iso} = F_{v, zero}$. By Lemma 77.8.5 applied to $v$ we see that $F_{u, iso} = F_{v, zero}$ is representable by a closed subspace of $B$. Note that $\mathcal{K}$ is of finite type if $\mathcal{G}$ is of finite presentation, see Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.24.1. Hence we also obtain the final statement of the lemma. $\square$
Lemma 77.9.2. In Situation 77.7.1. Assume
$f$ is locally of finite presentation,
$\mathcal{F}$ is locally of finite presentation and flat over $B$,
the support of $\mathcal{F}$ is proper over $B$, and
$u$ is surjective.
Then the functor $F_{iso}$ is an algebraic space and $F_{iso} \to B$ is a closed immersion. If $\mathcal{G}$ is of finite presentation, then $F_{iso} \to B$ is of finite presentation.
Proof. Let $\mathcal{K} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(u)$ and denote $v : \mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{F}$ the inclusion. By Lemma 77.7.5 we see that $F_{u, iso} = F_{v, zero}$. By Lemma 77.8.6 applied to $v$ we see that $F_{u, iso} = F_{v, zero}$ is representable by a closed subspace of $B$. Note that $\mathcal{K}$ is of finite type if $\mathcal{G}$ is of finite presentation, see Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.24.1. Hence we also obtain the final statement of the lemma. $\square$
We will use the following (easy) result when discussing the Quot functor.
Lemma 77.9.3. In Situation 77.7.1. Assume
$f$ is locally of finite presentation,
$\mathcal{G}$ is of finite type,
the support of $\mathcal{G}$ is proper over $B$.
Then $F_{surj}$ is an algebraic space and $F_{surj} \to B$ is an open immersion.
Proof. Consider $\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(u)$. Observe that $\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(u_ T) = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(u)_ T$ for any $T/B$. Note that formation of the support of a finite type quasi-coherent module commutes with pullback (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.15.1). Hence $F_{surj}$ is representable by the open subspace of $B$ corresponding to the open set
\[ |B| \setminus |f|(\text{Supp}(\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(u))) \]
see Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.4.8. This is an open because $|f|$ is closed on $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G})$ and $\text{Supp}(\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(u))$ is a closed subset of $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G})$. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)