The Stacks project

Lemma 99.14.6. The functor (99.14.1.1) defines a $1$-morphism

\[ \mathcal{P}\! \mathit{olarized}\to \mathcal{S}\! \mathit{paces}'_{fp, flat, proper} \]

of stacks in groupoids over $\mathit{Sch}_{fppf}$ which is algebraic in the sense of Criteria for Representability, Definition 97.8.1.

Proof. By Lemmas 99.13.3 and 99.14.3 the statement makes sense. To prove it, we choose a scheme $S$ and an object $\xi = (X \to S)$ of $\mathcal{S}\! \mathit{paces}'_{fp, flat, proper}$ over $S$. We have to show that

\[ \mathcal{X} = (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} \times _{\xi , \mathcal{S}\! \mathit{paces}'_{fp, flat, proper}} \mathcal{P}\! \mathit{olarized} \]

is an algebraic stack over $S$. Observe that an object of $\mathcal{X}$ is given by a pair $(T/S, \mathcal{L})$ where $T$ is a scheme over $S$ and $\mathcal{L}$ is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_{X_ T}$-module which is ample on $X_ T/T$. Morphisms are defined in the obvious manner. In particular, we see immediately that we have an inclusion

\[ \mathcal{X} \subset \mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/S} \]

of categories over $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$, inducing equality on morphism sets. Since $\mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/S}$ is an algebraic stack by Proposition 99.10.2 it suffices to show that the inclusion above is representable by open immersions. This is exactly the content of Descent on Spaces, Lemma 74.13.2. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0D41. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.