Processing math: 0%

The Stacks project

Lemma 85.4.2. In Situation 85.3.3 let a_0 be an augmentation towards a site \mathcal{D} as in Remark 85.4.1. Then a_0 induces

  1. a morphism of topoi a_ n : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_ n) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) for all n \geq 0,

  2. a morphism of topoi a : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_{total}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D})

such that

  1. for all \varphi : [m] \to [n] we have a_ m \circ f_\varphi = a_ n,

  2. if g_ n : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_ n) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_{total}) is as in Lemma 85.3.5, then a \circ g_ n = a_ n, and

  3. a_*\mathcal{F} for \mathcal{F} \in \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_{total}) is the equalizer of the two maps a_{0, *}\mathcal{F}_0 \to a_{1, *}\mathcal{F}_1.

Proof. Case A. Let u_ n : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C}_ n be the common value of the functors u_\varphi \circ u_0 for \varphi : [0] \to [n]. Then u_ n corresponds to a morphism of sites a_ n : \mathcal{C}_ n \to \mathcal{D}, see Sites, Lemma 7.14.4. The same lemma shows that for all \varphi : [m] \to [n] we have a_ m \circ f_\varphi = a_ n.

Case B. Let u_ n : \mathcal{C}_ n \to \mathcal{D} be the common value of the functors u_0 \circ u_\varphi for \varphi : [0] \to [n]. Then u_ n is cocontinuous and hence defines a morphism of topoi a_ n : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_ n) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D)}, see Sites, Lemma 7.21.2. The same lemma shows that for all \varphi : [m] \to [n] we have a_ m \circ f_\varphi = a_ n.

Consider the functor a^{-1} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_{total}) which to a sheaf of sets \mathcal{G} associates the sheaf \mathcal{F} = a^{-1}\mathcal{G} whose components are a_ n^{-1}\mathcal{G} and whose transition maps \mathcal{F}(\varphi ) are the identifications

f_\varphi ^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ m = f_\varphi ^{-1} a_ m^{-1}\mathcal{G} = a_ n^{-1}\mathcal{G} = \mathcal{F}_ n

for \varphi : [m] \to [n], see the description of \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_{total}) in Lemma 85.3.4. Since the functors a_ n^{-1} are exact, a^{-1} is an exact functor. Finally, for a_* : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_{total}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) we take the functor which to a sheaf \mathcal{F} on \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{D}) associates

\xymatrix{ a_*\mathcal{F} \ar@{=}[r] & \text{Equalizer}(a_{0, *}\mathcal{F}_0 \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & a_{1, *}\mathcal{F}_1) }

Here the two maps come from the two maps \varphi : [0] \to [1] via

a_{0, *}\mathcal{F}_0 \to a_{0, *}f_{\varphi , *} f_\varphi ^{-1}\mathcal{F}_0 \xrightarrow {\mathcal{F}(\varphi )} a_{0, *}f_{\varphi , *} \mathcal{F}_1 = a_{1, *}\mathcal{F}_1

where the first arrow comes from 1 \to f_{\varphi , *} f_\varphi ^{-1}. Let \mathcal{G}_\bullet denote the constant coosimplicial sheaf with value \mathcal{G} and let a_{\bullet , *}\mathcal{F} denote the cosimplicial sheaf having a_{n, *}\mathcal{F}_ n in degree n. By the usual adjuntion for the morphisms of topoi a_ n we see that a map a^{-1}\mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{F} is the same thing as a map

\mathcal{G}_\bullet \longrightarrow a_{\bullet , *}\mathcal{F}

of cosimplicial sheaves. By the dual to Simplicial, Lemma 14.20.2 this is the same thing as a map \mathcal{G} \to a_*\mathcal{F}. Thus a^{-1} and a_* are adjoint functors and we obtain our morphism of topoi a1. The equalities a \circ g_ n = f_ n follow immediately from the definitions. \square

[1] In case B the morphism a corresponds to the cocontinuous functor \mathcal{C}_{total} \to \mathcal{D} sending U in \mathcal{C}_ n to u_ n(U).

Comments (4)

Comment #6284 by Rachel Webb on

In the third highlighted equation of the proof, should the third instance of (counting from the left) be ?

Comment #8761 by ZL on

I'm a little confused by the notion of simplicial sheaves. Say that is a sheaf of . For each , there is a comparison morphism . Apply to , we get a morphism in . Hence the construction seems to be a cosimplicial sheaves. Also the morphism goes the other direction of augmentation in Lemma 14.20.2. So it looks more like a "co-augmentation"?


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0D70. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.