Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 85.34.2. Let S be a scheme. Let X be an algebraic space over S. Let U be a simplicial algebraic space over S. Let a : U \to X be an augmentation. If a : U \to X is an fppf hypercovering of X, then

a^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)

is an equivalence fully faithful with quasi-inverse given by a_*. Here a : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (U_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale}) is as in Section 85.32.

Proof. Consider the diagram of Lemma 85.34.1. In the proof of this lemma we have seen that h_{-1} is the morphism a_ X of More on Cohomology of Spaces, Section 84.7. Thus it follows from More on Cohomology of Spaces, Lemma 84.7.1 that

(h_{-1})^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big})

is an equivalence with quasi-inverse h_{-1, *}. The same holds true for the components h_ n of h. Recall that \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) and \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total}) consist of cartesian modules whose components are quasi-coherent, see Lemma 85.12.10. Since the functors h^* and h_* of Lemma 85.7.2 agree with the functors h_ n^* and h_{n, *} on components we conclude that

h^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total})

is an equivalence with quasi-inverse h_*. Observe that U is a hypercovering of X in (\textit{Spaces}/S)_{fppf} as defined in Section 85.21. By Lemma 85.22.1 we see that a_{fppf}^* is fully faithful with quasi-inverse a_{fppf, *} and with essential image the cartesian sheaves of \mathcal{O}_{fppf, total}-modules. Thus, by the description of \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big}) and \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total}) of Lemma 85.12.10, we get an equivalence

a_{fppf}^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big}) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total})

with quasi-inverse given by a_{fppf, *}. A formal argument (chasing around the diagram) now shows that a^* is fully faithful on \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) and has image contained in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U).

Finally, suppose that \mathcal{G} is in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U). Then h^*\mathcal{G} is in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total}). Hence h^*\mathcal{G} = a_{fppf}^*\mathcal{H} with \mathcal{H} = a_{fppf, *}h^*\mathcal{G} in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big}) (see above). In turn we see that \mathcal{H} = (h_{-1})^*\mathcal{F} with \mathcal{F} = h_{-1, *}\mathcal{H} in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X). Going around the diagram we deduce that h^*\mathcal{G} \cong h^*a^*\mathcal{F}. By fully faithfulness of h^* we conclude that a^*\mathcal{F} \cong \mathcal{G}. Since \mathcal{F} = h_{-1, *}a_{fppf, *}h^*\mathcal{G} = a_*h_*h^*\mathcal{G} = a_*\mathcal{G} we also obtain the statement that the quasi-inverse is given by a_*. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.