Lemma 85.34.2. Let S be a scheme. Let X be an algebraic space over S. Let U be a simplicial algebraic space over S. Let a : U \to X be an augmentation. If a : U \to X is an fppf hypercovering of X, then
a^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)
is an equivalence fully faithful with quasi-inverse given by a_*. Here a : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (U_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale}) is as in Section 85.32.
Proof.
Consider the diagram of Lemma 85.34.1. In the proof of this lemma we have seen that h_{-1} is the morphism a_ X of More on Cohomology of Spaces, Section 84.7. Thus it follows from More on Cohomology of Spaces, Lemma 84.7.1 that
(h_{-1})^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big})
is an equivalence with quasi-inverse h_{-1, *}. The same holds true for the components h_ n of h. Recall that \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) and \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total}) consist of cartesian modules whose components are quasi-coherent, see Lemma 85.12.10. Since the functors h^* and h_* of Lemma 85.7.2 agree with the functors h_ n^* and h_{n, *} on components we conclude that
h^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total})
is an equivalence with quasi-inverse h_*. Observe that U is a hypercovering of X in (\textit{Spaces}/S)_{fppf} as defined in Section 85.21. By Lemma 85.22.1 we see that a_{fppf}^* is fully faithful with quasi-inverse a_{fppf, *} and with essential image the cartesian sheaves of \mathcal{O}_{fppf, total}-modules. Thus, by the description of \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big}) and \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total}) of Lemma 85.12.10, we get an equivalence
a_{fppf}^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big}) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total})
with quasi-inverse given by a_{fppf, *}. A formal argument (chasing around the diagram) now shows that a^* is fully faithful on \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) and has image contained in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U).
Finally, suppose that \mathcal{G} is in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U). Then h^*\mathcal{G} is in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big, total}). Hence h^*\mathcal{G} = a_{fppf}^*\mathcal{H} with \mathcal{H} = a_{fppf, *}h^*\mathcal{G} in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{big}) (see above). In turn we see that \mathcal{H} = (h_{-1})^*\mathcal{F} with \mathcal{F} = h_{-1, *}\mathcal{H} in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X). Going around the diagram we deduce that h^*\mathcal{G} \cong h^*a^*\mathcal{F}. By fully faithfulness of h^* we conclude that a^*\mathcal{F} \cong \mathcal{G}. Since \mathcal{F} = h_{-1, *}a_{fppf, *}h^*\mathcal{G} = a_*h_*h^*\mathcal{G} = a_*\mathcal{G} we also obtain the statement that the quasi-inverse is given by a_*.
\square
Comments (0)