The Stacks project

Lemma 91.16.5. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $\mathcal{O} \to \mathcal{O}_0$ be a surjection of sheaves of rings. Assume given the following data

  1. a complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules $\mathcal{F}^\bullet $,

  2. a complex $\mathcal{K}_0^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{O}_0$-modules,

  3. a quasi-isomorphism $\mathcal{K}_0^\bullet \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{O}_0$,

Then there exist a quasi-isomorphism $\mathcal{G}^\bullet \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet $ such that the map of complexes $\mathcal{G}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{O}_0 \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{O}_0$ factors through $\mathcal{K}_0^\bullet $ in the homotopy category of complexes of $\mathcal{O}_0$-modules.

Proof. Set $\mathcal{F}_0^\bullet = \mathcal{F}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{O}_0$. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.9.8 there exists a factorization

\[ \mathcal{K}_0^\bullet \to \mathcal{L}_0^\bullet \to \mathcal{F}_0^\bullet \]

of the given map such that the first arrow has an inverse up to homotopy and the second arrow is termwise split surjective. Hence we may assume that $\mathcal{K}_0^\bullet \to \mathcal{F}_0^\bullet $ is termwise surjective. In that case we take

\[ \mathcal{G}^ n = \mathcal{F}^ n \times _{\mathcal{F}^ n_0} \mathcal{K}_0^ n \]

and everything is clear. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0DIX. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.