The Stacks project

Lemma 108.4.3. Assume $X \to B$ is proper as well as of finite presentation. Then $\mathcal{C}\! \mathit{oh}_{X/B} \to B$ satisfies the existence part of the valuative criterion (Morphisms of Stacks, Definition 101.39.10).

Proof. Taking base change, this immediately reduces to the following problem: given a valuation ring $R$ with fraction field $K$ and an algebraic space $X$ proper over $R$ and a coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X_ K}$-module $\mathcal{F}_ K$, show there exists a finitely presented $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ flat over $R$ whose generic fibre is $\mathcal{F}_ K$. Observe that by Flatness on Spaces, Theorem 77.4.5 any finite type quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ flat over $R$ is of finite presentation. Denote $j : X_ K \to X$ the embedding of the generic fibre. As a base change of the affine morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ the morphism $j$ is affine. Thus $j_*\mathcal{F}_ K$ is quasi-coherent. Write

\[ j_*\mathcal{F}_ K = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}_ i \]

as a filtered colimit of its finite type quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-submodules, see Limits of Spaces, Lemma 70.9.2. Since $j_*\mathcal{F}_ K$ is a sheaf of $K$-vector spaces over $X$, it is flat over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Thus each $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is flat over $R$ as flatness over a valuation ring is the same as being torsion free (More on Algebra, Lemma 15.22.10) and torsion freeness is inherited by submodules. Finally, we have to show that the map $j^*\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}_ K$ is an isomorphism for some $i$. Since $j^*j_*\mathcal{F}_ K = \mathcal{F}_ K$ (small detail omitted) and since $j^*$ is exact, we see that $j^*\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}_ K$ is injective for all $i$. Since $j^*$ commutes with colimits, we have $\mathcal{F}_ K = j^*j_*\mathcal{F}_ K = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits j^*\mathcal{F}_ i$. Since $\mathcal{F}_ K$ is coherent (i.e., finitely presented), there is an $i$ such that $j^*\mathcal{F}_ i$ contains all the (finitely many) generators over an affine étale cover of $X$. Thus we get surjectivity of $j^*\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}_ K$ for $i$ large enough. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #4851 by Kiran Kedlaya on

Is the properness assumption really relevant here? It seems that the proof only uses that the morphism is qcqs (which is included in finite presentation).

Comment #5143 by on

The problem is with the reduction in the first step. Namely, in order to check you end up in you need to check that the support is proper over the base. See Section 99.5.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0DM0. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.