Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 76.55.3. Let S be a scheme. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of algebraic spaces over S. The following are equivalent:

  1. f is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1,

  2. for every scheme Z and any morphism Z \to Y the morphism Z \times _ Y X \to Z is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1,

  3. for every affine scheme Z and any morphism Z \to Y the morphism Z \times _ Y X \to Z is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1,

  4. there exists a scheme V and a surjective étale morphism V \to Y such that V \times _ Y X \to V is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1,

  5. there exists a scheme U and a surjective étale morphism \varphi : U \to X such that the composition f \circ \varphi is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1,

  6. for every commutative diagram

    \xymatrix{ U \ar[d] \ar[r] & V \ar[d] \\ X \ar[r] & Y }

    where U, V are schemes and the vertical arrows are étale the top horizontal arrow is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1,

  7. there exists a commutative diagram

    \xymatrix{ U \ar[d] \ar[r] & V \ar[d] \\ X \ar[r] & Y }

    where U, V are schemes, the vertical arrows are étale, and U \to X is surjective such that the top horizontal arrow is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1, and

  8. there exist Zariski coverings Y = \bigcup _{i \in I} Y_ i, and f^{-1}(Y_ i) = \bigcup X_{ij} such that each morphism X_{ij} \to Y_ i is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1.

Proof. Omitted. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.