Proof.
Since \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{urves}\longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}) is locally of finite presentation (Lemma 109.5.3) formation of the open substack where \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{urves}\longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}) is smooth commutes with flat base change (Morphisms of Stacks, Lemma 101.33.6). Since the Cohen ring \Lambda is flat over \mathbf{Z}, we may work over \Lambda . In other words, we are trying to prove that
\Lambda \text{-}\mathcal{C}\! \mathit{urves}\longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\Lambda )
is smooth in an open neighbourhood of the point x_0 : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \Lambda \text{-}\mathcal{C}\! \mathit{urves} defined by X/k if and only if \mathcal{D}\! \mathit{ef}_ X is unobstructed.
The lemma now follows from Geometry of Stacks, Lemma 107.2.7 and the equality
\mathcal{D}\! \mathit{ef}_ X = \mathcal{F}_{\Lambda \text{-}\mathcal{C}\! \mathit{urves}, k, x_0}
This equality is not completely trivial to esthablish. Namely, on the left hand side we have the deformation category classifying all flat deformations Y \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) of X as a scheme over A \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_\Lambda ). On the right hand side we have the deformation category classifying all flat morphisms Y \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) with special fibre X where Y is an algebraic space and Y \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is proper, of finite presentation, and of relative dimension \leq 1. Since A is Artinian, we find that Y is a scheme for example by Spaces over Fields, Lemma 72.9.3. Thus it remains to show: a flat deformation Y \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) of X as a scheme over an Artinian local ring A with residue field k is proper, of finite presentation, and of relative dimension \leq 1. Relative dimension is defined in terms of fibres and hence holds automatically for Y/A since it holds for X/k. The morphism Y \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is proper and locally of finite presentation as this is true for X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k), see More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.10.3.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #3174 by Anonymous on
Comment #3288 by Johan on