The Stacks project

Lemma 76.26.8. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. Assume that $f$ is locally of finite presentation and Cohen-Macaulay. Then there exist open and closed subschemes $X_ d \subset X$ such that $X = \coprod _{d \geq 0} X_ d$ and $f|_{X_ d} : X_ d \to Y$ has relative dimension $d$.

Proof. Choose a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ U \ar[d] \ar[r] & V \ar[d] \\ X \ar[r] & Y } \]

with étale vertical arrows and $U$ and $V$ schemes. Then $U \to V$ is locally of finite presentation and Cohen-Macaulay (immediate from our definitions). Thus we have a decomposition $U = \coprod _{d \geq 0} U_ d$ into open and closed subschemes with $f|_{U_ d} : U_ d \to V$ of relative dimension $d$, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.29.4. Let $u \in U$ with image $x \in |X|$. Then $f$ has relative dimension $d$ at $x$ if and only if $U \to V$ has relative dimension $d$ at $u$ (this follows from our definitions). In this way we see that $U_ d$ is the inverse image of a subset $X_ d \subset |X|$ which is necessarily open and closed. Denoting $X_ d$ the corresponding open and closed algebraic subspace of $X$ we see that the lemma is true. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0E11. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.