Lemma 61.16.1. Let X be a scheme. Let \mathcal{F} be a presheaf of sets on X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} which sends finite disjoint unions to products. Then \mathcal{F}^\# (W) = \mathcal{F}(W) if W is an affine weakly contractible object of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}.
Proof. Recall that \mathcal{F}^\# is equal to (\mathcal{F}^+)^+, see Sites, Theorem 7.10.10, where \mathcal{F}^+ is the presheaf which sends an object U of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits H^0(\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F}) where the colimit is over all pro-étale coverings \mathcal{U} of U. Thus it suffices to prove that (a) \mathcal{F}^+ sends finite disjoint unions to products and (b) sends W to \mathcal{F}(W). If U = U_1 \amalg U_2, then given a pro-étale covering \mathcal{U} = \{ f_ j : V_ j \to U\} of U we obtain pro-étale coverings \mathcal{U}_ i = \{ f_ j^{-1}(U_ i) \to U_ i\} and we clearly have
because \mathcal{F} sends finite disjoint unions to products (this includes the condition that \mathcal{F} sends the empty scheme to the singleton). This proves (a). Finally, any pro-étale covering of W can be refined by a finite disjoint union decomposition W = W_1 \amalg \ldots W_ n by Lemma 61.13.2. Hence \mathcal{F}^+(W) = \mathcal{F}(W) exactly because the value of \mathcal{F} on W is the product of the values of \mathcal{F} on the W_ j. This proves (b). \square
Comments (0)