The Stacks project

Lemma 81.12.3. Let $P$ be one of the following properties of morphisms: “finite”, “closed immersion”, “flat”, “finite type”, “flat and finite presentation”, “étale”. Under the equivalence of Lemma 81.12.2 the morphisms having $P$ correspond to morphisms of triples whose components have $P$.

Proof. Let $P'$ be one of the following properties of homomorphisms of rings: “finite”, “surjective”, “flat”, “finite type”, “flat and of finite presentation”, “étale”. Translated into algebra, the statement means the following: If $A \to B$ is an $R$-algebra homomorphism and $A$ and $B$ are glueable for $(R \to R', f)$, then $A_ f \to B_ f$ and $A \otimes _ R R' \to B \otimes _ R R'$ have $P'$ if and only if $A \to B$ has $P'$.

By More on Algebra, Lemmas 15.90.5 and 15.90.19 the algebraic statement is true for $P'$ equal to “finite” or “flat”.

If $A_ f \to B_ f$ and $A \otimes _ R R' \to B \otimes _ R R'$ are surjective, then $N = B/A$ is an $R$-module with $N_ f = 0$ and $N \otimes _ R R' = 0$ and hence vanishes by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.90.3. Thus $A \to B$ is surjective.

If $A_ f \to B_ f$ and $A \otimes _ R R' \to B \otimes _ R R'$ are finite type, then we can choose an $A$-algebra homomorphism $A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B$ such that $A_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B_ f$ and $(A \otimes _ R R')[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B \otimes _ R R'$ are surjective (small detail omitted). We conclude that $A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B$ is surjective by the previous result. Thus $A \to B$ is of finite type.

If $A_ f \to B_ f$ and $A \otimes _ R R' \to B \otimes _ R R'$ are flat and of finite presentation, then we know that $A \to B$ is flat and of finite type by what we have already shown. Choose a surjection $A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B$ and denote $I$ the kernel. By flatness of $B$ over $A$ we see that $I_ f$ is the kernel of $A_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B_ f$ and $I \otimes _ R R'$ is the kernel of $A \otimes _ R R'[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B \otimes _ R R'$. Thus $I_ f$ is a finite $A_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$-module and $I \otimes _ R R'$ is a finite $(A \otimes _ R R')[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$-module. By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.90.5 applied to $I$ viewed as a module over $A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$ we conclude that $I$ is a finitely generated ideal and we conclude $A \to B$ is flat and of finite presentation.

If $A_ f \to B_ f$ and $A \otimes _ R R' \to B \otimes _ R R'$ are étale, then we know that $A \to B$ is flat and of finite presentation by what we have already shown. Since the fibres of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ are isomorphic to fibres of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B_ f) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ f)$ or $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B/fB) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/fA)$, we conclude that $A \to B$ is unramified, see Morphisms, Lemmas 29.35.11 and 29.35.12. We conclude that $A \to B$ is étale by Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.16 for example. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0F9R. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.