Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 42.50.9. In Lemma 42.47.1 say E_2 is the restriction of a perfect E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X) whose restriction to X_1 is zero, resp. isomorphic to a finite locally free \mathcal{O}_{X_1}-module of rank < p sitting in cohomological degree 0. Then the class P'_ p(E_2), resp. c'_ p(E_2) of Lemma 42.47.1 agrees with P_ p(X_2 \to X, E), resp. c_ p(X_2 \to X, E) of Definition 42.50.3 provided E satisfies assumption (3) of Situation 42.50.1.

Proof. The assumptions on E imply that there is an open U \subset X containing X_1 such that E|_ U is zero, resp. isomorphic to a finite locally free \mathcal{O}_ U-module of rank < p. See More on Algebra, Lemma 15.75.7. Let Z \subset X be the complement of U in X endowed with the reduced induced closed subscheme structure. Then P_ p(X_2 \to X, E) = (Z \to X_2)_* \circ P_ p(Z \to X, E), resp. c_ p(X_2 \to X, E) = (Z \to X_2)_* \circ c_ p(Z \to X, E) by Lemma 42.50.8. Now we can prove that P_ p(X_2 \to X, E), resp. c_ p(X_2 \to X, E) satisfies the characterization of P'_ p(E_2), resp. c'_ p(E_2) given in Lemma 42.47.1. Namely, by the relation P_ p(X_2 \to X, E) = (Z \to X_2)_* \circ P_ p(Z \to X, E), resp. c_ p(X_2 \to X, E) = (Z \to X_2)_* \circ c_ p(Z \to X, E) just proven and the fact that X_1 \cap Z = \emptyset , the composition P_ p(X_2 \to X, E) \circ i_{1, *}, resp. c_ p(X_2 \to X, E) \circ i_{1, *} is zero by Lemma 42.50.7. On the other hand, P_ p(X_2 \to X, E) \circ i_{2, *} = P_ p(E_2), resp. c_ p(X_2 \to X, E) \circ i_{2, *} = c_ p(E_2) by Lemma 42.50.6. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.