Lemma 42.34.6. Let $(S, \delta )$ be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let $X$ be a finite type scheme over $S$ which has an ample invertible sheaf. Assume $d = \dim (X) < \infty $ (here we really mean dimension and not $\delta $-dimension). Then for any invertible sheaves $\mathcal{L}_1, \ldots , \mathcal{L}_{d + 1}$ on $X$ we have $c_1(\mathcal{L}_1) \circ \ldots \circ c_1(\mathcal{L}_{d + 1}) = 0$ in $A^{d + 1}(X)$.

**Proof.**
We prove this by induction on $d$. The base case $d = 0$ is true because in this case $X$ is a finite set of closed points and hence every invertible module is trivial. Assume $d > 0$. By Divisors, Lemma 31.15.12 we can write $\mathcal{L}_{d + 1} \cong \mathcal{O}_ X(D) \otimes \mathcal{O}_ X(D')^{\otimes -1}$ for some effective Cartier divisors $D, D' \subset X$. Then $c_1(\mathcal{L}_{d + 1})$ is the difference of $c_1(\mathcal{O}_ X(D))$ and $c_1(\mathcal{O}_ X(D'))$ and hence we may assume $\mathcal{L}_{d + 1} = \mathcal{O}_ X(D)$ for some effective Cartier divisor.

Denote $i : D \to X$ the inclusion morphism and denote $i^* \in A^1(D \to X)$ the bivariant class given by the gysin hommomorphism as in Lemma 42.33.3. We have $i_* \circ i^* = c_1(\mathcal{L}_{d + 1})$ in $A^1(X)$ by Lemma 42.29.4 (and Lemma 42.33.4 to make sense of the left hand side). Since $c_1(\mathcal{L}_ i)$ commutes with both $i_*$ and $i^*$ (by definition of bivariant classes) we conclude that

Thus we conclude by induction on $d$. Namely, we have $\dim (D) < d$ as none of the generic points of $X$ are in $D$. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)

There are also: