Lemma 50.15.2. Let X \to S be a morphism of schemes. Let Y \subset X be an effective Cartier divisor. Assume the de Rham complex of log poles is defined for Y \subset X over S. There is a canonical short exact sequence of complexes
Proof. Our assumption is that for every y \in Y and local equation f \in \mathcal{O}_{X, y} of Y we have
for some module M with f-torsion free exterior powers \wedge ^ p(M). It follows that
Below we will tacitly use these facts. In particular the sheaves \Omega ^ p_{X/S} have no nonzero local sections supported on Y and we have a canonical inclusion
see More on Flatness, Section 38.42. Let U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) be an affine open subscheme such that Y \cap U = V(f) for some nonzerodivisor f \in A. Let us consider the \mathcal{O}_ U-submodule of \Omega ^ p_{X/S}(Y)|_ U generated by \Omega ^ p_{X/S}|_ U and \text{d}\log (f) \wedge \Omega ^{p - 1}_{X/S} where \text{d}\log (f) = f^{-1}\text{d}(f). This is independent of the choice of f as another generator of the ideal of Y on U is equal to uf for a unit u \in A and we get
which is a section of \Omega _{X/S} over U. These local sheaves glue to give a quasi-coherent submodule
Let us agree to think of \Omega ^ p_{Y/S} as a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module. There is a unique surjective \mathcal{O}_ X-linear map
defined by the rule
for all opens U as above and all \eta ' \in \Omega ^ p_{X/S}(U) and \eta \in \Omega ^{p - 1}_{X/S}(U). If a form \eta over U restricts to zero on Y \cap U, then \eta = \text{d}f \wedge \eta ' + f\eta '' for some forms \eta ' and \eta '' over U. We conclude that we have a short exact sequence
for all p. We still have to define the differentials \Omega ^ p_{X/S}(\log Y) \to \Omega ^{p + 1}_{X/S}(\log Y). On the subsheaf \Omega ^ p_{X/S} we use the differential of the de Rham complex of X over S. Finally, we define \text{d}(\text{d}\log (f) \wedge \eta ) = -\text{d}\log (f) \wedge \text{d}\eta . The sign is forced on us by the Leibniz rule (on \Omega ^\bullet _{X/S}) and it is compatible with the differential on \Omega ^\bullet _{Y/S}[-1] which is after all -\text{d}_{Y/S} by our sign convention in Homology, Definition 12.14.7. In this way we obtain a short exact sequence of complexes as stated in the lemma. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: