The Stacks project

Lemma 56.10.10. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$, $Y$ be finite type schemes over $k$. Let $K_0 \to K_1 \to K_2 \to \ldots $ be a system of objects of $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y})$ and $m \geq 0$ an integer such that

  1. $H^ q(K_ i)$ is nonzero only for $q \leq m$,

  2. for every coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ with $\dim (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})) = 0$ the object

    \[ R\text{pr}_{2, *}( \text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y}}^\mathbf {L} K_ n) \]

    has vanishing cohomology sheaves in degrees outside $[-m, m] \cup [-m - n, m - n]$ and for $n > 2m$ the transition maps induce isomorphisms on cohomology sheaves in degrees in $[-m, m]$.

Then $K_ n$ has vanishing cohomology sheaves in degrees outside $[-m, m] \cup [-m - n, m - n]$ and for $n > 2m$ the transition maps induce isomorphisms on cohomology sheaves in degrees in $[-m, m]$. Moreover, if $X$ and $Y$ are smooth over $k$, then for $n$ large enough we find $K_ n = K \oplus C_ n$ in $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y})$ where $K$ has cohomology only indegrees $[-m, m]$ and $C_ n$ only in degrees $[-m - n, m - n]$ and the transition maps define isomorphisms between various copies of $K$.

Proof. Let $Z$ be the scheme theoretic support of an $\mathcal{F}$ as in (2). Then $Z \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ is finite, hence $Z \times Y \to Y$ is finite. It follows that for an object $M$ of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y})$ with cohomology sheaves supported on $Z \times Y$ we have $H^ i(R\text{pr}_{2, *}(M)) = \text{pr}_{2, *}H^ i(M)$ and the functor $\text{pr}_{2, *}$ is faithful on quasi-coherent modules supported on $Z \times Y$; details omitted. Hence we see that the objects

\[ \text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y}}^\mathbf {L} K_ n \]

in $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y})$ have vanishing cohomology sheaves outside $[-m, m] \cup [-m - n, m - n]$ and for $n > 2m$ the transition maps induce isomorphisms on cohomology sheaves in $[-m, m]$. Let $z \in X \times Y$ be a closed point mapping to the closed point $x \in X$. Then we know that

\[ K_{n, z} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y, z}}^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{O}_{X \times Y, z}/\mathfrak m_ x^ t\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y, z} \]

has nonzero cohomology only in the intervals $[-m, m] \cup [-m - n, m - n]$. We conclude by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.99.2 that $K_{n, z}$ only has nonzero cohomology in degrees $[-m, m] \cup [-m - n, m - n]$. Since this holds for all closed points of $X \times Y$, we conclude $K_ n$ only has nonzero cohomology sheaves in degrees $[-m, m] \cup [-m - n, m - n]$. In exactly the same way we see that the maps $K_ n \to K_{n + 1}$ are isomorphisms on cohomology sheaves in degrees $[-m, m]$ for $n > 2m$.

If $X$ and $Y$ are smooth over $k$, then $X \times Y$ is smooth over $k$ and hence regular by Varieties, Lemma 33.25.3. Thus we will obtain the direct sum decomposition of $K_ n$ as soon as $n > 2m + \dim (X \times Y)$ from Lemma 56.10.5. The final statement is clear from this. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #5918 by Noah Olander on

"Vanishing" is misspelled a few times here.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0FZ9. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.