Lemma 13.42.1. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a triangulated category. Let $(A_ i)$ be an inverse system in $\mathcal{D}$. Then $(A_ i)$ is essentially constant (see Categories, Definition 4.22.1) if and only if there exists an $i$ and for all $j \geq i$ a direct sum decomposition $A_ j = A \oplus Z_ j$ such that (a) the maps $A_{j'} \to A_ j$ are compatible with the direct sum decompositions and identity on $A$, (b) for all $j \geq i$ there exists some $j' \geq j$ such that $Z_{j'} \to Z_ j$ is zero.
13.42 Essentially constant systems
Some preliminary lemmas on essentially constant systems in triangulated categories.
Proof. Assume $(A_ i)$ is essentially constant with value $A$. Then $A = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits A_ i$ and there exists an $i$ and a morphism $A_ i \to A$ such that (1) the composition $A \to A_ i \to A$ is the identity on $A$ and (2) for all $j \geq i$ there exists a $j' \geq j$ such that $A_{j'} \to A_ j$ factors as $A_{j'} \to A_ i \to A \to A_ j$. From (1) we conclude that for $j \geq i$ the maps $A \to A_ j$ and $A_ j \to A_ i \to A$ compose to the identity on $A$. It follows that $A_ j \to A$ has a kernel $Z_ j$ and that the map $A \oplus Z_ j \to A_ j$ is an isomorphism, see Lemmas 13.4.12 and 13.4.11. These direct sum decompositions clearly satisfy (a). From (2) we conclude that for all $j$ there is a $j' \geq j$ such that $Z_{j'} \to Z_ j$ is zero, so (b) holds. Proof of the converse is omitted. $\square$
Lemma 13.42.2. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a triangulated category. Let be an inverse system of distinguished triangles in $\mathcal{D}$. If $(A_ n)$ and $(C_ n)$ are essentially constant, then $(B_ n)$ is essentially constant and their values fit into a distinguished triangle $A \to B \to C \to A[1]$ such that for some $n \geq 1$ there is a map of distinguished triangles which induces an isomorphism $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{n' \geq n} A_{n'} \to A$ and similarly for $B$ and $C$.
\[ A_ n \to B_ n \to C_ n \to A_ n[1] \]
\[ \xymatrix{ A_ n \ar[d] \ar[r] & B_ n \ar[d] \ar[r] & C_ n \ar[d] \ar[r] & A_ n[1] \ar[d] \\ A \ar[r] & B \ar[r] & C \ar[r] & A[1] } \]
Proof. After renumbering we may assume that $A_ n = A \oplus A'_ n$ and $C_ n = C \oplus C'_ n$ for inverse systems $(A'_ n)$ and $(C'_ n)$ which are essentially zero, see Lemma 13.42.1. In particular, the morphism
\[ C \oplus C'_ n \to (A \oplus A'_ n)[1] \]
maps the summand $C$ into the summand $A[1]$ for all $n$ by a map $\delta : C \to A[1]$ which is independent of $n$. Choose a distinguished triangle
\[ A \to B \to C \xrightarrow {\delta } A[1] \]
Next, choose a morphism of distingished triangles
\[ (A_1 \to B_1 \to C_1 \to A_1[1]) \to (A \to B \to C \to A[1]) \]
which is possible by TR3. For any object $D$ of $\mathcal{D}$ this induces a commutative diagram
\[ \xymatrix{ \ldots \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(C, D) \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(B, D) \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(A, D) \ar[r] \ar[d] & \ldots \\ \ldots \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(C_ n, D) \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(B_ n, D) \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {D}(A_ n, D) \ar[r] & \ldots } \]
The left and right vertical arrows are isomorphisms and so are the ones to the left and right of those. Thus by the 5-lemma we conclude that the middle arrow is an isomorphism. It follows that $(B_ n)$ is isomorphic to the constant inverse system with value $B$ by the discussion in Categories, Remark 4.22.7. Since this is equivalent to $(B_ n)$ being essentially constant with value $B$ by Categories, Remark 4.22.5 the proof is complete. $\square$
Lemma 13.42.3. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Let $A_ n$ be an inverse system of objects of $D(\mathcal{A})$. Assume
there exist integers $a \leq b$ such that $H^ i(A_ n) = 0$ for $i \not\in [a, b]$, and
the inverse systems $H^ i(A_ n)$ of $\mathcal{A}$ are essentially constant for all $i \in \mathbf{Z}$.
Then $A_ n$ is an essentially constant system of $D(\mathcal{A})$ whose value $A$ satisfies that $H^ i(A)$ is the value of the constant system $H^ i(A_ n)$ for each $i \in \mathbf{Z}$.
Proof. By Remark 13.12.4 we obtain an inverse system of distinguished triangles
\[ \tau _{\leq a}A_ n \to A_ n \to \tau _{\geq a + 1}A_ n \to (\tau _{\leq a}A_ n)[1] \]
Of course we have $\tau _{\leq a}A_ n = H^ a(A_ n)[-a]$ in $D(\mathcal{A})$. Thus by assumption these form an essentially constant system. By induction on $b - a$ we find that the inverse system $\tau _{\geq a + 1}A_ n$ is essentially constant, say with value $A'$. By Lemma 13.42.2 we find that $A_ n$ is an essentially constant system. We omit the proof of the statement on cohomologies (hint: use the final part of Lemma 13.42.2). $\square$
Lemma 13.42.4. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a triangulated category. Let be an inverse system of distinguished triangles. If the system $C_ n$ is pro-zero (essentially constant with value $0$), then the maps $A_ n \to B_ n$ determine a pro-isomorphism between the pro-object $(A_ n)$ and the pro-object $(B_ n)$.
\[ A_ n \to B_ n \to C_ n \to A_ n[1] \]
Proof. For any object $X$ of $\mathcal{D}$ consider the exact sequence
\[ \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (C_ n, X) \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (B_ n, X) \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (A_ n, X) \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (C_ n[-1], X) \to \]
Exactness follows from Lemma 13.4.2 combined with Algebra, Lemma 10.8.8. By assumption the first and last term are zero. Hence the map $\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (B_ n, X) \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (A_ n, X)$ is an isomorphism for all $X$. The lemma follows from this and Categories, Remark 4.22.7. $\square$
Lemma 13.42.5. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. be an inverse system of maps of $D(\mathcal{A})$. Assume
there exist integers $a \leq b$ such that $H^ i(A_ n) = 0$ and $H^ i(B_ n) = 0$ for $i \not\in [a, b]$, and
the inverse system of maps $H^ i(A_ n) \to H^ i(B_ n)$ of $\mathcal{A}$ define an isomorphism of pro-objects of $\mathcal{A}$ for all $i \in \mathbf{Z}$.
\[ A_ n \to B_ n \]
Then the maps $A_ n \to B_ n$ determine a pro-isomorphism between the pro-object $(A_ n)$ and the pro-object $(B_ n)$.
Proof. We can inductively extend the maps $A_ n \to B_ n$ to an inverse system of distinguished triangles $A_ n \to B_ n \to C_ n \to A_ n[1]$ by axiom TR3. By Lemma 13.42.4 it suffices to prove that $C_ n$ is pro-zero. By Lemma 13.42.3 it suffices to show that $H^ p(C_ n)$ is pro-zero for each $p$. This follows from assumption (2) and the long exact sequences
\[ H^ p(A_ n) \xrightarrow {\alpha _ n} H^ p(B_ n) \xrightarrow {\beta _ n} H^ p(C_ n) \xrightarrow {\delta _ n} H^{p + 1}(A_ n) \xrightarrow {\epsilon _ n} H^{p + 1}(B_ n) \]
Namely, for every $n$ we can find an $m > n$ such that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\beta _ m)$ maps to zero in $H^ p(C_ n)$ because we may choose $m$ such that $H^ p(B_ m) \to H^ p(B_ n)$ factors through $\alpha _ n : H^ p(A_ n) \to H^ p(B_ n)$. For a similar reason we may then choose $k > m$ such that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\delta _ k)$ maps to zero in $H^{p + 1}(A_ m)$. Then $H^ p(C_ k) \to H^ p(C_ n)$ is zero because $H^ p(C_ k) \to H^ p(C_ m)$ maps into $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\delta _ m)$ and $H^ p(C_ m) \to H^ p(C_ n)$ annihilates $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\delta _ m) = \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\beta _ m)$. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)