Lemma 59.94.1. The map i^{-1}\beta _{K, \overline{s}, \overline{t}} is an isomorphism.
Proof. The construction of the maps h, i, \beta _{K, \overline{s}, \overline{t}} only depends on the base change of X and K to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}^{sh}_{S, \overline{s}}). Thus we may and do assume that S is a strictly henselian scheme with closed point \overline{s}. Observe that the local acyclicity of f relative to K is preserved by this base change (for example by Lemma 59.93.4 or just directly by comparing strictly henselian rings in this very special case).
Let \overline{x} be a geometric point of X_{\overline{s}}. Or equivalently, let \overline{x} be a geometric point whose image by f is \overline{s}. Let us compute the stalk of i^{-1}\beta _{K, \overline{s}, \overline{t}} at \overline{x}. First, we have
since pullback preserves stalks, see Lemma 59.36.2. Since we are in the situation S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}^{sh}_{S, \overline{s}}) we see that h : X_{\overline{t}} \to X has the property that X_{\overline{t}} \times _ X \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}^{sh}_{X, \overline{x}}) = F_{\overline{x}, \overline{t}}. Thus we see that
where the equal sign is Theorem 59.53.1. It follows that the map (\beta _{K, \overline{s}, \overline{t}})_{\overline{x}} is none other than the map \alpha _{K, \overline{x}, \overline{t}} used in Definition 59.93.1. The result follows as we may check whether a map is an isomorphism in stalks by Theorem 59.29.10. \square
Comments (0)