Lemma 59.94.2. In the situation above, if in addition $f$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, then the diagram

is commutative.

Lemma 59.94.2. In the situation above, if in addition $f$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, then the diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ (Rf_*K)_{\overline{s}} \ar[r] \ar[d]_{sp} & R\Gamma (X_{\overline{s}}, K) \\ (Rf_*K)_{\overline{t}} \ar[r] & R\Gamma (X_{\overline{t}}, K) \ar[u]_{cosp} } \]

is commutative.

**Proof.**
As in the proof of Lemma 59.94.1 we may replace $S$ by $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}^{sh}_{S, \overline{s}})$. Then our maps simplify to $h : X_{\overline{t}} \to X$, $i : X_{\overline{s}} \to X$, and $\beta _{K, \overline{s}, \overline{t}} : K \to Rh_*(K|_{X_{\overline{t}}})$. Using that $(Rf_*K)_{\overline{s}} = R\Gamma (X, K)$ by Theorem 59.53.1 the composition of $sp$ with the base change map $(Rf_*K)_{\overline{t}} \to R\Gamma (X_{\overline{t}}, K)$ is just pullback of cohomology along $h$. This is the same as the map

\[ R\Gamma (X, K) \xrightarrow {\beta _{K, \overline{s}, \overline{t}}} R\Gamma (X, Rh_*(K|_{X_{\overline{t}}})) = R\Gamma (X_{\overline{t}}, K) \]

Now the map $cosp$ first inverts the $=$ sign in this displayed formula, then pulls back along $i$, and finally applies the inverse of $i^{-1}\beta _{K, \overline{s}, \overline{t}}$. Hence we get the desired commutativity. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)