The Stacks project

Lemma 15.74.11. Let $R$ be a ring. If $K$ and $L$ are perfect objects of $D(R)$, then $K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} L$ is a perfect object too.

Proof. We can prove this using the definition as follows. We may represent $K$, resp. $L$ by a bounded complex $K^\bullet $, resp. $L^\bullet $ of finite projective $R$-modules. Then $K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} L$ is represented by the bounded complex $\text{Tot}(K^\bullet \otimes _ R L^\bullet )$. The terms of this complex are direct sums of the modules $M^ a \otimes _ R L^ b$. Since $M^ a$ and $L^ b$ are direct summands of finite free $R$-modules, so is $M^ a \otimes _ R L^ b$. Hence we conclude the terms of the complex $\text{Tot}(K^\bullet \otimes _ R L^\bullet )$ are finite projective.

Another proof can be given using the characterization of perfect complexes in Lemma 15.74.2 and the corresponding lemmas for pseudo-coherent complexes (Lemma 15.64.16) and for tor amplitude (Lemma 15.66.10 used with $A = B = R$). $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 6 comment(s) on Section 15.74: Perfect complexes

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0GM0. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.