Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 70.16.4. Let S be a scheme. Let X be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated algebraic space over S. There exists a t \geq 0 and closed subspaces

X \supset Z_0 \supset Z_1 \supset \ldots \supset Z_ t = \emptyset

such that Z_ i \to X is of finite presentation, Z_0 \subset X is a thickening, and for each i = 0, \ldots t - 1 there exists a scheme Y_ i, a surjective, finite, and finitely presented morphism Y_ i \to Z_ i which is finite étale over Z_ i \setminus Z_{i + 1}.

Proof. We may view X as an algebraic space over \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}), see Spaces, Definition 65.16.2 and Properties of Spaces, Definition 66.3.1. Thus we may apply Proposition 70.8.1. It follows that we can find an affine morphism X \to X_0 with X_0 of finite presentation over \mathbf{Z}. If we can prove the lemma for X_0, then we can pull back the stratification and the morphisms to X and get the result for X; some details omitted. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume X is of finite presentation over \mathbf{Z}. Then X is Noetherian and |X| is a Noetherian topological space (with finitely many irreducible components) of finite dimension. Hence we may use induction on \dim (|X|). Any finite morphism towards X is of finite presentation, so we can ignore that requirement in the rest of the proof. By Lemma 70.16.3 there exists a surjective finite morphism Y \to X which is finite étale over a dense open U \subset X. Set Z_0 = X and let Z_1 \subset X be the reduced closed subspace with |Z_1| = |X| \setminus |U|. By induction we find an integer t \geq 0 and a filtration

Z_1 \supset Z_{1, 0} \supset Z_{1, 1} \supset \ldots \supset Z_{1, t} = \emptyset

by closed subspaces, where Z_{1, 0} \to Z_1 is a thickening and there exist finite surjective morphisms Y_{1, i} \to Z_{1, i} which are finite étale over Z_{1, i} \setminus Z_{1, i + 1}. Since Z_1 is reduced, we have Z_1 = Z_{1, 0}. Hence we can set Z_ i = Z_{1, i - 1} and Y_ i = Y_{1, i - 1} for i \geq 1 and the lemma is proved. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.